My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1989/08/02 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1989/08/02 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 12:19:22 PM
Creation date
9/29/2020 8:24:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
8/2/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
August 2,1989 303 <br /> I <br /> Ted Trepanier, Project E gineex, revlessd the r cent changus which <br /> locatiotl a too stay buPPer fo"the nds,h, nd°l5fur oP ht:afrng <br /> considersons to stay out of consultantsulta, and etainex ndafhis <br /> union alsonco Another soils was retained and M1le <br /> opinion also confirmed that the site te buildable. <br /> Jack Herkldy, Project Landscape Architect, discussed the 50 foot <br /> buffer et the north end of the property. He also recommended that <br /> n <br /> the turn out be removed to lessen the impact in thea wetland areas. <br /> He also reviewed thevisual impact screening and the stream Corridor <br /> vegetation. <br /> Darren Berg, Vice President of Axelrod, the apartment complex <br /> pagers, explained financial impacts and economic factors which <br /> make the number of 103 units socritical to the success of the <br /> project. <br /> analysisLarr <br /> Rees and <br /> yRees, <br /> for Hmultiple family Associates stated <br /> tine the area.prepared <br /> reviewed market <br /> the <br /> apartmvacancy ents tin the Ees and epi tt- Snohomish bountyment forecasts iareBshow the need for more <br /> Jim Allendorfer, Attorney for[hneighborhood group, reviewed the <br /> Planning Commission action. He stated the applicant is requesting <br /> the maximum units allowed under the proposed o He recommended <br /> that the applicant wait to develop the property until the revised <br /> zoning code is adopted. <br /> He then summarized the rezone request, statinthe detail of the <br /> project has not defined as to the total number of units that will be <br /> able to be built on the site. He felt the project will havean <br /> adverse impacton <br /> the schools; traffic, density, and the <br /> neighborhood. He requested that the appeal be denied due to the <br /> inadequate buffer zone, lack of'standards fax a <br /> za ,.lack of <br /> detail of the project,lack of technical detail ofsoils conditions, <br /> and that a net density analysis be required. <br /> Mark Amrhein, Geotechnical Engineer,reported on the instability of <br /> the soils and the landslide activity in the area. He questioned <br /> whether the site was safe for building. <br /> Katie Johnson,2618 View Crest,spoke of the impacts to the schools. ,_,.„_ <br /> Mark Houser, 1 12.Holbrook, spoke about the adverse impacts oP 'a'4_- <br /> traffic en the neighborhood and Lha City. <br /> Carl Varner,5133 o expressed the neighborhood c and the <br /> loss of privacy. He Dover, <br /> n <br /> stated the large multi-family units are <br /> e in <br /> direct opposition to the single family environment of the area. <br /> Gary Stanlfer, 5725 Glenwood, stated he lives across from the j... <br /> proposedprojectand tressed the adversevisual impacts and lack of II <br /> privacy project will bring to the neighborhooch <br /> Linde Levwnbergen, 5620 Glenwood, requested that further Leafing <br /> regarding the stream corridor impacts be done. She expressed <br /> concern t the regarding thei <br /> negative visual impact to the neighborhood and <br /> Pel <br /> project is incompatible with the area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.