Laserfiche WebLink
33 wsy '. 505 ' <br /> il ',' Aug.23,1949 <br /> ` h <br /> He said comments were made that there was not a mix of housing types <br /> and he said this was true,but it is not necessary to provide a <br /> mixture of housing types. The campo <br /> plan allows a variety f housing <br /> �1 types in a low density multiple but does not require a mixture. <br /> He said that Kr.Allendorfer had stated that the former Owner of the <br /> property, Unity Church, had said the property was unbuildable. He <br /> ps because they did not have the money a reason a letter from the church stating that the ren Por <br /> ailing the property w to <br /> build on the property. <br /> ¢( He then read a report from en additional consultant hired by the <br /> applicant that stated there is a minimal risk of slope instability <br /> Pp onthe site but the site is stable with r pect to landslides. <br /> # Final project design should include site specific explorations due <br /> to the presence of fill and the past e grading. Difficult site <br /> conditions areusually better handled with larger budget commercial <br /> projects then smell single family developments. <br /> Darren Berg, Vice President Real Estate for the Axelrod Co., e <br /> multi-family development firere in Seattle, said they were the <br /> i. eventual owners <br /> of the or posetl project. He said this is not a <br /> s question of is thissite buildable or is it not,1t is a function of <br /> economics. s the eveloper willing to pay to build the site? He <br /> said they intendto do whatever is told to them by the soils <br /> ss to se e to it the site and this project is built, <br /> stableigedleized and will stay on the side of the hill. He then showed <br /> ‘41P <br /> .d consultants <br /> of other projects they had constructed showing setbacks and <br /> 140' <br /> Q"[ <br /> ,y,t wetlands. He qestioned if his we sold as single family <br /> k� residential,who would be responsible for the wetlands. <br /> Aeck Kerplotz said they are committed to a 50 ft setback along the <br /> /10'1 property lines. About 40 to 45 Peet Of that can bepreserved <br /> lthaut disturbing the vegetation. Also the undisturbed foreground <br /> and wetland vegetation along Glenwood Ave. The 3rd committment is <br /> screen fence along the Zents. The <br /> gen <br /> 1 JJ➢. 41{ the proposal to include screen final co.4th en the m ted enhanced <br /> colors of the apartments. The <br /> final mmittment is the enhanced a een plantinga long Glenwood <br /> Ave. <br /> f' ti. Hansen then said the applicant is providing housing convenient <br /> } 1, <br /> to job e cimpact on an of a Brea street. He dei riff development will <br /> have en redato but not a great impact on the en traffic. The adpbycthe <br /> ciity's traffic to experts.rovide the The fulllschoolmitigation <br /> districts has indicated determined <br /> thet the no <br /> �II' y a <br /> 3 .- mitigation is required because of this development. <br /> Jim Pllendorfer of 5301 Ocean Drive representing theneighborhood <br /> known as CARE, said the joint traffic report for the four projects <br /> J in SW Everett including the Glenwood Apartments had been criticized <br /> and found to be inadequate by the Dept.ofn <br /> Transportation. <br /> There <br /> m <br /> e letter from Wilsey and Ham consulting su g en9 9 Pi <br /> also seriously criticized the.study. <br /> He said the s cand issue was the question of housing mix. He <br /> thought there should be some single family or duplex units proposed <br /> for the site. The comp plan requires that there be a limited amount <br /> OP multiple family developm <br /> ent in this category. He said he also <br /> thoughtithastha de satuld be a practice of 1 O e family-multiple <br /> size buffer. He said buffer.other <br /> city ma a a an <br /> .p __..- ___ % <br />