1989/09/20 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

I 4 Sept.20,1989 Justin Osmene of the Planning Department said the applicant, Associated Sand and Gravel located at 6300 Glen.. Ave., has applied for a Comprehensive General Plan Amendment and Rezone of approximately 2.7 ciesresofof land from'Single Family Residential 1-5 Dwelling Units per Gross Acre" to Industrial-Office and Industrial Park/Special Manufacturing," and the Rezone of the samesite from the present"R-1: Single Family Low Density Residential" to"0-1: Heavy Manufacturing"Zone. The location of the property is 300 feet north of 73rd St.S.X.and Upper Ridge Read. In addition to the Comprehensive General Plan Amendment and Rezone, a Special Property Use permit is being sought from the Hearing Examiner to allow the extension of the mining activities and the future reclamation of the site in a manner consistent with the State Dept. of Natural Resources and RCW Chapter 78.44.Reclamation Plana requirements after extraction is completed. The proposal will also provides for stable slope and vegetative screen buffer project the mining and the adjacent residential areae to the proposed t site. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposal on July-6, 1989 and voted to approve the change in the corp Plan but voted to take no action on the rezone. Since noaction w taken on the rezone application, the applicant filedan appeal to City Council in accordance with EMC 19.68.010. He said notices had been sent to all the neighbors about the public hearing tonight. He showed slides of the arca involved. There will be shrubbery planted at Associated Sand's expense in the 25 foot buffer area owned by Associated with the residents maintaining'it. He said Upper Ridge Road will be closed and Associated will construct another rod to Hartlesan. The applicant must have a property use permit. The hearing was held two weeks ago but the hearing examiner has not made a decision yet. He said there are five alternative actions the council can take: 1. Adopt a solution amending the Land Use Map andapprove the rezone request. 2. Adopt a solution amsntlincg the Lantl Use Map antl eoggrove the rezone request ewitM1 speciPi!0 c tli tions es a contract iez I j zone } 3. Deny the rezone request. ,,'A A+ Remand mond the application back to the Planning Commission and request that they make further study, ns a dfurtheron public hearings, ��I and make cilSnitive findings,conclusions and recommendations to the Y City council. pI ��I 5. Take such further action as the council deems appropiate. ;.,1,\ ]..,,._ Councilmember Overstreet asked if the staff had s recommendation and 1 Paul Roberts, Community Development Director, said under the Circumstances they were comfortable in recommending approval of the but he id it was important to know that a SPU is before the hearing examiner and it is in the context of that recommendation 9