Laserfiche WebLink
315 t <br /> Sept.20,1585 <br /> that staff has put Porth a fairly extensive series of specific <br /> recommendations toc ondition that pcrmit. He said their <br /> recommendatsubstantial)oactivit esn is to aPoniard <br /> re taking place over the rezone <br /> course of his <br /> application. One is that staff has consistently been on record hisinseeking reclamation of the site and stabeliratlon of the banks which <br /> abutt the properties, along Veralene Estates. Associated has d <br /> one <br /> this. The second is that staff has asked that Associated go back <br /> ands correct any problems that existed with regard to previous permit <br /> conditions'and they' have shown goad faith i attempt to do that. <br /> It doesn't diminish same of the issues that have been raised by the <br /> residents living in the areaand staff has attempted to do those in <br /> the SPU permit'which is theappropriate place to eo this, <br /> Reid Shocker,representing Associated Sand,said the purpose of this <br /> particular rezone is to conclude the process that Associated began <br /> back in 1586 regarding the relocation of Upper Ridge Road. He s id <br /> President Kiva was right, the property in question was designated <br /> reresidentirin idential in the Comp Plan. It could have been designated Medium <br /> Manufat ring but <br /> h regardless of whet the designation s the only <br /> Y going to occur in the <br /> rezone area iaslope. The <br /> purpose is to allow the cul-de-sac to be built and to allow lopes <br /> to tone constructed <br /> eevdate that cul-de-sac and down at tie <br /> orkshops held at View Ridge School where d roert. k then neighborsh wer ere wall <br /> invited to comment on it d we told them that for one year while <br /> Upper ge was closed they would see an increase in traffic on <br /> ower Ridge Road. <br /> Councilmember Morrow asked Mr.Shocker about Haul Road. He said the <br /> bid Haul Road came right back of the Veralene residents property and <br /> they were concerned about this. <br /> In answering s <br /> question from President Siva, Mr. Shocker Said when <br /> thee area wasdeveloped the permit said the developer should provide <br /> 15 ft.buffer, but it didn't say it should be planted. Icould <br /> beeainterpreted that you cant take 15 feet of vegetation o T <br /> he <br /> rn this is being discussed to there is a discussion about a25 <br /> ft.set-beck et the top of the slope,and there is a two way s <br /> out devthe l developer wassupposedsupposed to provide a 15 foot buffer. He pointetreetd <br /> some tle B opinions are different and some want buffers and <br /> n'tCounciieember Gipson a ked when he area Ss r egetated there 0111 <br /> remainchange Sn the slopes and M[, Shocker said na It viii still <br /> a slope. <br /> President Niva asked if the stabelisation was the cause of the noise <br /> and the dust and was that completed now, Nr. Shockey replied this <br /> wastrue and they have moved east now. <br /> Geno Romero of 503 Veralene said he had never received any notice <br /> about <br /> hedbeen abouts 200 ft. of closing <br /> ebetween the Road. <br /> plat Band said <br /> the also <br /> old there <br /> aul <br /> Road area which have since been removed. This caused more dust end <br /> renoises louder. He then presented somenoise levels he had <br /> recorded during the night hours of Sept.IS. They were much hither <br /> than the levels presented by the Safetyety Inspector. He iso <br /> presented a letter from Jeff season of 6012 Nenview 0r. who said he <br /> heard the noise and had the dust also and objected to this. <br />