Laserfiche WebLink
522 December 13,1989 <br /> She further stated that she will be acting as the presiding officer <br /> Poi the hearing. The Council is concerned that the hearing be fair <br /> in form and substance,and fair in appearance as <br /> well. She asked if <br /> any Councilmember knew of any reel o potentialconflict which would <br /> cause that member to avoid participation in the the hearings. No <br /> one replied. <br /> She asked if any property owneror representative objected for any <br /> 310 <br /> to her participation any other councilmeabers <br /> participation in the proceedings. Noro replied. <br /> President Niva pointed out that no formal rules of evidence will <br /> control this nearing and the purpose of the hearing is to afford <br /> nd n <br /> ivedual property owners an opportunity to present information and <br /> evIdence <br /> eothe City Council explaining the reasons for <br /> objection to e <br /> y proposed assessment. The hearing is not intended <br /> tohe a question and answer session, but, instead, is the final <br /> opportunity for property owners to present evidence or information <br /> q4 1 'ji before action is taken to confirm the final assessment roll. This <br /> n <br /> r f is not the time to ask questions about the nature of the project or <br /> the improvements that have been installed, unless those questions <br /> 1^ relate to the amount ter f en assessment which the City proposes to <br /> levy against the rpro are <br /> con <br /> The protests objections which made ill be noted and <br /> 4 test htl end may be respondednopportunity <br /> to by the City. IP a written <br /> protest has been filed,en ppaxtuni toy 111 be given to address the <br /> Y " toudoil. 8 cabinetten protest hes not been filed, now is the time <br /> yyy Ssoil protest must be filed in ostler to gbe heard. <br /> 2 <br /> { Blain a runes,Special LID counsel,explained the various ways of <br /> y 1,}(' then tarhea a LID. If the LID benefits a dgetinct axes aT the cure <br /> people in that ase M10 ase getting the benefit a <br /> b <br /> ( required to uc y Pox St. This la known as the specie]bene Plts LID. <br /> c <br /> LID)2is s h a lacai improvement. <br /> ,l' , Mr.Burroughs stated special note should be made of the sale of the <br /> MI none arcel Sn aowwner ust, 1989. There m y he a question of parcel <br /> to <br /> '�I.. be scheduled if property a limited LID hearing on this pexce2 can <br /> y,,,I,,,:11-.,' ��, Brian Jones, LID Administrator, stated LID 728 w formed in <br /> I' response toy a petition filed by affected propertypwas <br /> owners. The <br /> �' purpose for construction of Nest Mall Drive,a new sreet extending <br /> approximately <br /> right-of-way.1700feet north from Everett Nall Nay along the Old <br /> ,✓ ' SII. The n street includes curbs,, gutters, <br /> n„ improvements <br /> storm drains, a new12-inch ter main, and signal <br /> improvements et the intersection of r West Mello Drive and Everett Mall <br /> Nay. As part of the project, signal p menta were also <br /> ( installed at the intersections of Everett Mall Way end East Mall and <br /> II.. Central Nall Drives. <br /> I 141 Nr. .tones stated the estimate of total project as is given in the <br /> I formation ordinance was$783,000. The actual cost of the project is <br /> ,9t#. f I8824,650. The increase in project cost(approximately 5 percent)is <br /> I attributable to the high cost of the right P way acquired from the <br /> PUD and the Guaranty Fund contribution charged pursuant to <br />�t i Resolution No.4002. <br /> i <br />