Laserfiche WebLink
518 <br /> v t <br /> December 13,1989 <br /> ' <br /> COUNCIL BILL 8910-94 <br /> 10',4,3,,,,, <br /> ' FINAL READING: <br /> �'., <br /> °4,4' AN ORDINANCE adopting the budget for the City of Everett for <br /> the year 1990. <br /> '','-1:::;:i:'!21 <br /> Novell by Councilmembax Morrow, seco tle0 by CPOnCllmamber Oaamontl <br /> yy' 8910 CM1ia ds he cleretl to s Pinel ettlxng oP heu roll Bfor the <br /> , <br /> 'M` 8910 94 end the City Clerk is directed to call the roll 4or the <br /> final disposition of the ordinance. <br /> �' AYES: LanstNiDiamond, Gipson,Paon, Noxrox, Papa, <br /> Ove <br /> ''_i�y NAYS: Nonea <br /> i Ordinance No.1664-B9 adopted. <br /> A7'5HEARING-SEPA APPEAL-ZONING CODE <br /> President e a opened of the hearing by stating the purpose on Co <br /> consider the appeal of SEPAE erettminetlg of Non-Significance Na, the proposed revision to the Everett Zoning Code and Zoning Nap, SEPA <br /> 1 E No.55-89. She stated the procedure would be as follows: <br /> 1.staff presentation <br /> " 2,appellant eresentetian <br /> +" }+} 3.brief co nts by cittrens as it relates to the item of <br /> ,1 anneal <br /> q r 4.staff spne <br /> 5.appellant response <br /> 6.pubCouncil <br /> hearing be atised <br /> ons <br /> V 7.Council tleliba[etiona and decision. <br /> All persons testifying before Council an this mattes xexe sworn in <br /> IN tt�,'�i by the City Clerk. <br /> 5+ Allan GSPPen, Planning Staff, reported that the Planning Staff and <br /> 11'101:'' <br /> '. Planning CPmmisslan have been 90 DS bn the Pio0eete revision to <br /> It After <br /> Everett Zoning Cotle and Zfnthe pro Por eDteReD aSio tel years. <br /> l.y tl� P APtax circulation and review of the proposed Determination of <br /> p Non-Signs91951 O (DNSO tl 31,19t0 public comments, the 'Rep <br /> �} issued a Pinel DNSon Octobe[31,1989 Poxthe pxoposatl Cotle and Map <br /> - ' Revision. On November 13, 1989, an appeal or the DNS was received <br /> from Ted Trepanier. <br /> 1 p� Council: <br /> Br.GiPPen stated Paas alternatives are available to <br /> ti 1. Affirm Determination Of Non-Significance: <br /> 2. Remand proposal to staff to generate specific additional <br /> 6 y information; <br /> i,'1. . Recommend preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement <br /> (EIk��i 4. Make additional findings and based upon those findings, <br /> $$�� revise the Determination of Non-Significance. <br /> 6"{ '. ' Mr. Trepanier's appeal was based on Chapter 19.50, environmentally <br /> sensitive a nv <br /> (, section,enteM1, in his eon land would have profound <br /> the <br /> �` Comprehensive <br /> on the development potential land designated in the <br /> Comprehensive Plan for development. <br />