Laserfiche WebLink
December 27,1989 Sag <br /> Lee Loveland, Director of Development for the Duryee Group, stated <br /> the pe owoor sh ordinance penalized the large project:. He eouested <br /> tM1atworkshop be M1eld to respontl to the <br /> mark Houser, Holbrook Street, x d passage oxoofnence. <br /> ordinance-and pointed out the short mCalle of$57, 0,ODOt to proposed <br /> the proposed City traffic improvements. plate <br /> Scutt Brown, 8nohomisM1 cauntyCaaano Bard oP ealtors, asked that <br /> language be adtletl to insure tlue process antl right o appeal. <br /> Moved by Councilmembex Pope, seconded by Councllmembe[ Longus to <br /> table action on the proposed ordinance to provide staff time to make <br /> gxandPathexingsclauses, gards to schools, City boundaries and <br /> • <br /> poll as lied with Coun cilaaebaea Longus antl Pope voting yes and <br /> Councilmembere Niva,Diamond,Gipson,Popa and Overstreet voting no. <br /> Motion to table defeated. <br /> amend by moesftlen["NS le, secontletl by Councilmembex Dvexatreet to <br /> tl the tionto include Section 21 and Section 22 as follows: <br /> Section 21: When determining the mitigation costs <br /> attributable to the proposed Development, the City's Traffic <br /> Engi her hall take into consideration and give fair credit <br /> transportation improvements that have been imposed as a <br /> • condition of a prior land use approval under which the <br /> development proposed. The City's t Engineer <br /> the hall also take einto sc the <br /> nuand give fair credit for <br /> his/her predecessor(s) <br /> made by the subject property ownerr <br /> transportation In interest pursuant toany <br /> District <br /> (LID), <br /> Li)mechanism.Transportation device s0 Benefit a District Improvement <br /> tastrt Local <br /> this Section 22' Properties which have,prior to the adoption of <br /> requiredtoperformn ect to SEP: review and have been <br /> condition of approval,transportation mitigation measures <br /> transportation improvements n and <br /> been constructed orts in i ac such <br /> ursued, will be exempt for the time eriod of the land actively <br /> approval process for which the SEPq approval ponds from <br /> this ordinance to the extend that their traffic volume o <br /> development intensity h <br /> o o exceed tl that upon which the <br /> decision as based. Should such projects those <br /> tprovisions <br /> heprovisithen additional traffic 1 <br /> D sot this ordinance, Provided,however,nothing <br /> herein shell be construed to contravene thethority f the <br /> Responsible Official as set Porth in WAC 19T_llu3a0(3)(e). <br /> Roll was celled with all councilmembers voting yes. <br /> Amendment carried. <br />