Laserfiche WebLink
59O <br /> December 27,1989 <br /> 1 4 <br /> berf!12:gttaebT 'f=m°m'er Overstreet <br /> to <br /> amend th : oranc71=heolc <br /> 1. Page 3-The recital on lines 1-7 to read as follows: <br /> WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the adoption of <br /> these interim transportation guidelines will provide <br /> the City's traffic engineer and SERA Responsible <br /> Official with direction In implementing the City's <br /> identified SERA policy for transportation during this <br /> interim period. <br /> 2. Page 5,Section 9(5)(2): <br /> line 25 1/2-insert comma after"percentage of" <br /> lines 25 1/2 and 26 1/2-remove the word"p.m."before <br /> "peak hour". <br /> 13. Page 5-Eliminate Section 0(C),lines 28-39. <br /> 4. Page 6, Section 11 - Add the following language to the <br /> aragraph which eno$on line 324 <br /> "Provided, if a project proponent disputes the Eighty <br /> Dollar ($80) fee described herein, the proponent has <br /> the option of having prepared at his/her expense a <br /> traffic impact analysis as described in this ordinance <br /> ) and as approved by the gity's Traffic Engineer and <br /> mitigate the transportation impacts in accordance with <br /> I I Sections 9(5)(1)and 9(B)(2)of this ordinance. <br /> Roll was called with all councilmembers voting yes. <br /> Amendment carried. <br /> 1 4 I <br /> Ig:'recommended that traficTti'tttsss' lorltapog=nacs reve.. nadLc.Ione7eliar.public <br /> hearing in early spring. <br /> The City Clerk was directed to call the roll an the final <br /> disposition of the ordinance as amended. <br /> AYES 14gus,Niva,Diamond,Borrow,Gipson,Overstreet <br /> NAYS. <br /> Ordinance No.1670-89 adopted. <br />