My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1989/12/27 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1989/12/27 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 12:29:26 PM
Creation date
9/29/2020 8:32:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
12/27/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
553 <br /> December 27,1,89 <br /> omoe <br /> with 721.r2e:e:v2=::"Ce%eldt egg"qUaleittyhcortefe:%%duledel: <br /> Protected. <br /> ItniZITTegegeth:T.321%nr.d'HreePerrseenetee'd thet larger <br /> could be accomplished. cSlyula010ns of 505 thle <br /> Ted Trepanier,1420 Grand,spoke on the density restrictions and the <br /> parking requirements which he feels adversely effect the property <br /> owner. He submitted a list of 8 changes to the code. <br /> William Blake, 804 Hoyt, remarked on his concerns of the impact of <br /> the zoning revisions on the quality of life and also the impact on <br /> the strength of the local economy. He recommended postponing <br /> adoption of the code. <br /> central roject he <br /> Tam Burns, Everett Area hemberof Commerce, spoke on the Everett <br /> Statedmcd urged adoption <br /> he is pleased with the final document <br /> Dana Warren, Cornerstone Columbia, 1011 Western, Seattle, spoke on <br /> the floor area ratio. He also remarked on the restrictive parking <br /> retefirements and the 20 foot view corridor. <br /> David Serving, 711 6th Avenue N,Seattle,Executive Director of the <br /> Washington Electric Sign Association, asked that serious <br /> consideration be given to the adverse effect the sign portion of the <br /> ordinance will have on local businesses. He also asked for further <br /> study on the removal of non-conforming signs and sign sizes. <br /> etntom'it's"oefe Sfkaiseteefroeo'd Oeutene:s". IT= sign tehle"prohpeoeseedn the <br /> of sign did not promote success in these business. <br /> X: rrrtht' eXneZ.deHt'leekel"Oeelq =ne:q;Iaeo business e asrsdabutfoe <br /> sign violations. <br /> aScott Parrott, 320,35th Ave W, stated he was not notified of the <br /> rete "erteeetl7 " ` drn" eree"ne " "elTnthat pulteon, irnoraenior thersteTO soI <br /> readings of proposed ordinances. <br /> ZsTirZtieoneu=n1XetItitheleatngeueagge:!egYlMi;" <br /> 'Modifications or alterations which create additional lots <br /> • <br /> within approved lots which are consistent with the previously <br /> approved Binding Site Plant or Master Plan provisions for a <br /> project are not considered major so long as they do not <br /> create additional development area or change access to public <br /> streets.. <br /> =olttdocTon reValD1r1g6!.treo:l.e"ke ee the'ePeet e'the <br /> President Hiva recessed the meeting until 5,00 a.m. on Thursday, <br /> December 28,198e. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.