Laserfiche WebLink
} 16 January 17,len <br /> Di. Oave Johnson of 4911 Harbor Lane p"Nd thi tlevelopment antl <br /> i spoke oT the employees PxOm Searay could be using Mukllkeo Blvd. <br /> also. <br /> David.Gardner of 3230 Rucker, Apt. 2, said there are no decent <br /> apartments available. He had looked a long time before he settled <br /> for the one he was living in and he felt this project was needed. <br /> In answer to a question from President Pope, Dave Savie, Traffic <br /> Engineer,said in the study for this project it was stated a traffic <br /> light would be needed at Glenwood and Mukilteo Blvd. in the near <br /> future. He said in erecent traffic count Mukilteo Bolvd. from <br /> Glenwood to Dogwood had a • <br /> count of 8,000 cars per From <br /> Dogwood <br /> to 41st St. the count went up to 14.,000 so there might have to be <br /> some wideningin that a He did not think Mukilteo Blvd. a <br /> s as <br /> whole would r be widened to four lanes because of the cost and <br /> loss of homes,sett. He is not proposing that Madison be widened to <br /> 5` <br /> four lanes an the near future.ere traffic volumes will be followed <br /> and when a point is reached where four lanesmight <br /> Ingttebe p oke hoursand <br /> eak hour restriction where parking is pulled w can <br /> after the peak hour in the evenings and.oneek-ends perking c <br />�4O come back. He said it wasvery likely four lanes would be needed In <br /> the future but not in the immediate future. <br /> 0110 Roberts of Seattle, spoke in favor of the project es did R. <br /> Wendellhedges,an apartment house manager. <br /> n a <br /> Joanne 5 th f 32115 19th Ave. S.E., en <br /> apartment house m negex, <br /> also spok i favor of the project. <br /> Jess Brantner of 4016 Hoyt spoke in fever as he felt more apartments <br /> were needed. <br /> he kpposetl the Hollrotk Ave.said the traffic study was In error and <br /> k Rabin Arnoltl P Freeland su'pportetl the project es it Wes needed Par <br /> the commereiei growth in.en thwest Everett. x <br /> Kettleen Johnson oP 2618 Viewcrest Ave. said the a is not a <br /> satisfactory location because oP ravines,etc.antl will eincrease[M1e <br /> load on schools. <br /> Jan Schwartz of 12115 10th Ave.S.E.spoke in favor of the proposal. <br /> affordable housint me he=in fe000d oPe thedproject,this was to be <br /> Bexbaxa Fey Df lore 113th St.S.E.spoke in eevex of the project es <br /> tlitl Ted Trepenier oP 1420 Grand. <br /> die Carter of 2020 74th St.spoke in favor of the project but said <br /> ithe developer had not ncrease 10 employment inthet the south end. to Everett, it was the <br /> John Dappen of 3108 23rd Ave,W.w s concerned about the impact ee <br /> the project an schools and traffic.a <br /> Councilmen Gipson asked if the council could work with the schools <br /> and Jim Iles, Asst. City Attorney, said there probably could w <br /> something implemented, <br />