1990/02/07 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

February 7,1990 53 The concomitant omitant agreement lists on additional condition which would require notice to the CARE neighborhood group. Condition 3 g. 1 would would regulate clearing in the buffer areas. This condition requires the Applicant, Planning and Parks Department staff, end representatives of the CARE neighborhood group to meet in the field to discuss which trees in the Construction of buildings, buffer areas cremoved to allow etc.. abuttingthebuffers 4j. In addition to the SEPA reviews, a subdivisionill be required for the i gl family plat. The it nt agreement includes a condition h h ttates that the bdi i L ill be processed in 114 accordance with tee Zoning.Ordinancein effect on December 26, 1989 • as modified by the Conditions of the concomitant agreement. CONCLUSION: The Planning Department would administratively review detailed plans for each phase at time of application for Building Permits through the SEPA review process. The applications would be reviewed per the • SEPA policies in effect at time of submittal of the applications. The conditions in the concomitant agreement require that adequate notice be providedto the neighborhood during future review of ' detailed plans for each phase, and that input from the neighborhood he considered by staff prior to the Planning Department issuing e final SEPA decision for each phase. A subdivision will also be required for the single family plat. The subdivision will be reviewed per the Zoning Ordinance In effect on December 26,1989 as modified by the conditions in the Concomitant Agreement to the rezone ordinance. FINDINGS• Zoning/General Plan/Density: The General Plan designation for the site is l.5/Multiple Family at 10 to if dwellings per gross acre. The existing zoning of the site is R-S, Single Family Suburban Residential and 0-1,Single Family Low Density Residential. At time of application for the r ,there w no zoning designation which implemented the General Plan designation The proposal is e rezone to R-3(0) with a Concomitant Agreement which contains conditions to restrict development and implement the General.Plan designation and policies. The Zoning Ceapproved by City Council on December 27, 1989 does include a which implements the General Plan designation-the R-3(L) zone. At time of adaption of the newZoning Code, City Council approved a vesting provision which statethat all r where a public hearing w s held by the Hearing Examiner, Planning Commission or City Council prior to the effective date of the new code would be processed in acordance with the zoning ordinances in effect atthe time of such public hearing. The provision also stated that if the rezone is approved,this ordinance shall apply to the development of any property subject to such unless specified in the The concomitantagreement includes condition which states ethat the csbdivision will be processed ainaccordance with the Zoning Ordinance in effect on December 26, 1989 ao modified by the conditions ofs the concomitant agreement. n This condition. was in the c agreement primarily due to the desire to maintain large lotsizes and the fact that the application for the rezone and master development site plan were in review by the City for almost two years before adoption of the new zoning code.