Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> ; <br /> February 7,1990 55 �li1 a' <br /> NLl it <br /> t has been the City's practice when determining the density for II )I <br /> • apartment projects under the old zoning code to 1 1 de all of the <br /> • area within the property lines and to not exclude �a 11 <br /> sensitive areas. The zoning code in effect t timePapplication <br /> • Por the proposal allows he transfer of development t usable I? <br /> portions of the site an multiple.family areas and this has b -done <br /> ii <br /> • sites throughout the City . The Zoning Code providesindirect <br /> • <br /> limitations on transferring development to buildable portions o4 a 11I <br /> , <br /> c <br /> site due to requirements for the provision of parking, recreation 1 <br /> • fatalities, setbacks, and height limits. The EIS for the Merrill. j I it <br /> Creek proposal included the identification and analysis sis of <br /> environmentally sensitive areas; andofpsconditions in the comitant j. <br /> agreement,state that development.is not permitted in those are <br /> • <br /> with limited exceptions. <br /> calculating grass acreage, the Merrill Creek proposal included <br /> the area <br /> within the. property lines. The calculations exclude the <br /> portion of the Merrill Creek Parkway right-of-ray that the Applicant <br /> dedicated to the City. .,. <br /> The Applicant originally completion <br /> proposed a project at 14.7 dwelling units <br /> a <br /> per gross After mpletion.of the EIS, the proposal was <br /> • revised to 1,284.units or 13.2 dwelling ritsgross <br /> During the Planning Commission hearing process. theper <br /> Applicant again <br /> • revised the proposal to 1,128 units Or 11.9 u s per grass acre. <br /> The Planning Commission recommendation x .approval of a proposal at <br /> • 1,070 .units or 11.5 units roper gross a This includes three <br /> multiple family phases at 12.1 dwelling units per g and a <br /> a <br /> Ingle family phase at 4.7 dwelling unite per gross gross <br /> City <br /> Council finds that this density is in conformance with theGeneral <br /> Plan policies and map designation for the site. <br /> f CONCLUSION: <br /> The site is designated Low Density Multiple Family (10 to 15 <br /> dwelling units per gross acre)and is located between areas to the <br /> • Orth which a e designated single family and a thesouth and <br /> est which a edesignated Office and Industrial Park. The single <br /> • family, townhouse, and multiple family uses proposed on the site <br /> will provide a transition between the existing single family uses <br /> and the more intensive.uses to the south and.west. The Concomitant <br /> il <br /> Agta includes conditions which implement me General Plan <br /> , <br /> policies• map designation. The density recommended Por approval <br /> by the Planning Commission (11.3 dwelling unitshex gross acre) is <br /> within the density range of the General Plan designation for the I <br /> site (10 to 15 dwelling units per gross acre). The project is in <br /> • harmony with the General Plan policies and map designation. 1 <br /> FINDINGS: en <br /> Buffers/Separation from Less Intensive U he General Plan <br /> includes a policy which states, "MultipleFamily Residential <br /> projects should provide adequate p do landscaping,buffering, <br /> r ing, pp <br /> use sscreening from areas designated f less intensive m sensitive I11 <br /> • <br /> • <br /> APlatconsisting of up t0 47 single family lots would be provided <br /> adjacent to the Plat of Edgemoox Heights to provide a.transition to I.I. <br /> the higher densities.on the southern portion of the site. The 3. <br /> • proposed single family lots provide a buffer/transition, area <br /> The lotsngof would the he asme minimum housing <br /> 12,500 square Peet where the they oabut .�, <br /> the Plat of Edgemoox Heights (the minimum lot size in the R-S zone) <br /> and a minimum o4 5,000 square Peet in the remainder of the single �, <br /> family plat area. <br />