1990/02/07 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

I 58 February],1990 proposal. In addition,the Applicantalsooffered a donation to the Mukilteo School District of 3.9 ac of property a; additional mitigation for use as school sites A condition requiring the mitigation is included n the concomitant agreement. The condition requires the stric,iP others Schools District takes actionortion of the to site to the proper District, of the property within ix montBased udacte of by the Mukilteo Findings and Conclusions.,CiCo un uponthis adequate School District.City Council finds that this danpiti000l de generated by ofthe tMerrilsignificant nCreek nproposal is to the Schaal District genera FINDINGS: Recreation Facilities: The Parks Department generally requires apartment proposals to mitigate recreational impacts through SEPA by the provision on-site facilities. to mitigatethent hasimpacts p f othe sed -pita recreational recreation center would be provided proposal on the cthree tmu A for each facilities tare eplrovidedc ineachphase, with more active. Both facilities fors children provided here the unit mix includes more two- and three-bedroom units. and townhouses. Additional facilitiesrecreatwhich ch would be provided for all of the phases include exercise trail or Parcourse, active and pashive recreation as each unit Cluster to allow range of free psuch uch areas frisbee,picnic tables antl barbecue are ,and nature txpils. The ea concomitant agreement includes Conditions which require that open space areas and recreation facilities be provided. These requirements contain the sa e language as that approved bCity Council in the re ently adapted Zoning Code. The Conditions require that on-site tifacilities be provided or the multiple : _ family phases; and thatfacilities bprovidedPor, pe available it t thesingle afaiPagreement requires that eecrtiontrail system be provided throughout the ( site. Centlbin the concomitant agreement also require that the facilities e balanced by probable tenant age gxour, indoor/outdoor facilities,and large/smell recreational areas. r CONCLUSIONS: The recreation facilities proposed by the Applicant and the conditions in the concomitant agreement which require on-site recreational facilities, trails, and provision of open space would adequatelymitigate the significant impacts of the Merrill Creek p proposal n the City's neighborhood park system. are in FINDINGS: Off-Site Traffic Impacts: (Detailed Findi g included Appendix 0 to the EI,raise 124 to 135 of theft EIS; pages 56 to 59, JS to J], end 00 of the for EIS. rag 18-20 of the Staff Report to Planning COmmeeslon f r the June 20, 1989 Public Hearing; pages 9 and 11 of the Staff Report to Planning Commission for the July 18,1989 public hearing; and pages 3 to 6 of the Staff Report Y Y to Planning Commission the October 17,.1989 public hearing. These findings are incorporated herein by reference.) Fr