Laserfiche WebLink
66 February T,1990 <br /> SPRING RUNOFF titled •The Public Narks Department is planning to sponsor a Pun r, <br /> "Spring <br /> Runoff" during <br /> 6-12,nWater Works <br /> Association'sNational <br /> Drinking WaterW k(ay1990) Thevntwill celebrate the <br /> ce he City's wtersupply,remind people <br /> t thlittl aPdi nnvatiOn and a a reminder of <br /> the need for <br /> protection oP our surface waters. The proposed site is the <br /> new <br /> Merrill Creek Parkway area. <br /> Moved by Cmuncilmember Overstreet, seconded by Councilmembei <br /> • <br /> Anderson to authorize the a of the Merrill Creek Parkway area for <br /> the'Spring ng t uWeek.Runoff"Pun un$e Saturday,May 19,1990,during National <br /> Drinking <br /> Roll was called with all Councilmembers voting yes. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> GRANT AGREEMENT <br /> The State of Washington has awarded Everett 87,000 to do additional <br /> historic survey work to produce a brochure an Downton Everett and ted by the <br /> Ste historic resources. The grant the giant w <br /> xant prolette were as written by David <br /> • <br /> DSlgextl Everett HP the Everetistorical t and Library , <br /> Moved by Councilmembei Marrow, seconded by Councilmembei Overstreet <br /> to authorize the Mayor to sign acgrant d�ageeement wi a the State <br /> Everettandits historic resourcerant s pro a on Downtown <br /> Roll was called with all councllmembers voting yes. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> COST SHARING AGREEMENT <br /> The Claremont Shopping Center has had a floodingproblem for manevery <br /> years due to an overloaded Combined s <br /> tfive he combinedsewer <br /> oerte system Landdxafloodingrunoff <br /> f exceeds thClaremontcapacity <br /> Shopping <br /> Center parking lot occurs. an <br /> A detention vault was designed as part of the Gateway LID to <br /> solve <br /> the problem. Rather than flooding the Claremont ShoppinCsotveg <br /> parking lot, combined sewage would be stored in the untlexgentn d <br /> vault durig heavy rainstorms. The total cost of the vault would <br /> have been approximately $820,000thantheconstructed <br /> am with•the Gateway <br /> was This amout was greater amount, so LID <br /> constructed without the detention vault. <br /> D on Grand <br /> enue <br /> Ipropoeddemulti-family development. SincewaLat least two of the is <br /> downstream of he the costly <br /> aspects <br /> mube <br /> t the Gateway LID detention vault lrequired <br /> ifiedtl Paa <br /> the private ternatiens,the private development was identified as a <br /> potential alternative site for an underground detention vault. <br /> N Investments, Inc.has agreed to construct an uednd detention <br /> telt on his p=asewell the detention vault eOgitl solve the <br /> • area-wide problem a <br /> well as meet the an-sate detention requirements <br /> of its development. <br />