Laserfiche WebLink
94 June 12,1991 <br /> (; <br /> WHEREAS, Mr..Butler's letter did not contain the information <br /> required in Chapter 2.23.200 E.M.C. including a brief statement <br /> s to how the appellant is aggrieved by the decision:a brief <br /> statement delineating the finding(s)orconclusion(s).appealed; <br /> a brief statement containing explicit exceptions and objections <br /> with regard to the appealed matter, and a statement of the <br /> requested relief;and <br /> WHEREAS, the City Council hes reviewed the letter of appeal <br /> against the requirements for appeal contained in Chapter �} <br /> 2.23.200 E.M.C.; <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF.THE CITY <br /> OF EVERETT,that the appellant did not adhere to the procedures <br /> established In the Everett Municipal Code for perfecting his <br /> appeal. Consequently, the City Council does not have <br /> jurisdiction to entertain the appeal and the appeal is <br /> therefore denied. <br /> Butler asked.that Council hear the issue and not dismiss <br /> this on a technicality. <br /> CoDiamond whoted o <br /> 1ncilman with <br /> tcouncilmen voting yes except 11..(mm) <br /> Motion carried. <br /> COUNCIL BILL 9105-27 <br /> FINAL READING: <br /> AN ORDINANCE providing for the vacation of a portion of <br /> 37th Street east of and adjacent to Grand Avenue plus a <br /> portion,of 30th Street east of and adjacent to Grand <br /> Avenue. <br /> Craig Fullerton stated that staff:x mmended this vacation... 0 <br /> It would benefit.the traffic.pattern in the area. Also the <br /> neighborhood favored this vacation. <br /> Moved by.Councilman Gipson, seconded.by Councilmen Overstreet <br /> that this is declared to be theFinal reeding of Council Bill <br /> No.9105-27. <br /> O <br />