Laserfiche WebLink
c 295 <br /> June 12,1991 <br /> President Morrow was apposed to thiscation as it would <br /> result in the building unaffordable housing• <br /> P discussion ensued regarding theissue of unaffordable housing. <br /> Councilman Anderson felt the City was giving up land without <br /> receiving any benefits. <br /> The City Clerk was directed to call the roll for the final <br /> disposition of the ordinance. <br /> AYES: Moser,Diamond,Gipson,Pope <br /> Overstreet <br /> NAYS: Anderson,Morrow <br /> Ordinance No. 1791-91 <br /> adopted. <br /> COUNCIL BILL 9106-29 <br /> SECOND,THIRD AND FINAL READING: <br /> - AN ORDINANCE relating to fireworks, adding five new <br /> sections to Ordinance No. 1091-84 (EMM Chapter 16.60)0 <br /> repealing Section 10 of Ordinance No. 1041-84 (ENC <br /> Chapter 16.60.110),and establishing effective dates for <br /> the new sections added to Ordinance No.1041-04. <br /> Mike Weight, assistant city attorney, explained that this <br /> ordinance would change the types of fireworks that are <br /> allowed <br /> to be sold, the times fireworks can be discharged and who they <br /> be sold to. He further gave statistics on injuries and <br /> fires involving fireworks. He said that State law requires a <br /> orm ing Ee io ornotice when changing the type of <br /> fireworks thatsold. <br /> councilmen.Gipson questionedthe section prohibiting the sale <br /> .Of fireworks to persons under .the e.age of 16. Mr. Weight <br /> related that this would put the responsibility of the purchase <br /> of fire works on persons.over 16 years of orthereby requiring <br /> that parents monitor hat their chiAdren using. <br /> Councilman Diamond asked if this ordinance w•s practical from <br /> an enforcement standpoint. Mr. Weight Cited the effectiveness <br /> of a similar ordinance in Edmonds. <br /> II' <br />