Laserfiche WebLink
390 <br /> 0 <br /> July 24,1991 <br /> (7) <br /> Councilman Gipson wanted to find a way in which many citizens <br /> could get involved, such as a round table discussion and asked <br /> what amount of time might it take to use this process. Allan <br /> Giffen felt it would take many Months. <br /> Councilman Anderson asked what selection process would be used <br /> for such a committee. <br /> Councilman Pope felt there was a need to work with the <br /> developers to be able to provide affordable housing. <br /> Councilman Diamond asked for Tom Lux to speak on this. <br /> Tom Lux, Planning Commission, felt that the citizen comments <br /> have been heard for the past eighteen months and the Commission <br /> has already struggled with their concerns. This action would <br /> be giving an ad hoc committee an advisory role and didn't feel <br /> this was the way to proceed. <br /> g'tfljaranl?tIrgt=oWitteet.'iwwX' 'id t""ti with Xt. Lux <br /> Clarification of the motion was discussed. <br /> (r) <br /> Moved by Councilman Pope, seconded by Councilman Diamond to <br /> remand the resolution adopting the General Plan Policies for <br /> Environmentally genitive Areas and the proposed ordinance <br /> rtrig:9Pf:gt,Mmm1=117e=a1o1T'n'i"V° ""° lank <br /> owing issues to be <br /> reviewed, <br /> 1. Consider alternatives to Category IV wetland and stream <br /> standards so fewer homeowners and builders are subject to <br /> the preservation and buffer requirements. <br /> 2. Consider lowering the wetland alteration mitigation reties. <br /> 3. Clarify the features that would be exempted from stream and <br /> wetland requirements, such as grass-lined swales,detention <br /> facilities,drainage ditches,etc. <br /> 4. Reconsider the requirement for a construction activity <br /> setback from buffers. <br /> S. 7 :=°17ttW !he calculation <br /> of=1% / sine ;1197ges <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br />