Laserfiche WebLink
391 <br /> July 26,1991 <br />/ (= <br /> 6. Reconsider the current lot size averaging section of the <br /> code to give developers more incentive Octave ESR's and <br /> still be able to develop single family lots, using the <br /> County.s ordinance as an example, with the possibility of <br /> allowing lots to be as small as 5,000 square feet. <br /> 7. Define"emergency, "public agency,"'public utility." <br /> 8. Reconsider the "wetland mitigation banking' provisions <br /> s C. related out of basin or watershed locations. <br /> 9. Consider exempting shoreline areas from City wetland <br /> standards when proposals would be subject to the Corps of <br /> Engineers 404(B)permit review PrOeese. <br /> 10.Consider other Met..to allow the transfer of development <br /> rights (TOR),to occur in single family zones besides the <br /> Planned Residential Development(PRD)process. <br /> II':=VddgnottronanclUe:,'"Ment reg'rd'ng "net ''in' in <br /> 12.Reconsider whether the'Hillside Development Standards'are 1 <br /> o really necessary. <br /> 13.Reconsider the criteria for exempting public agencies and <br /> utilities to make them subject to the same rules as the <br /> private sector. <br /> Roll was called with all councilmen voting yes except <br /> Councilman Gipson and President Morrow who voted no and <br /> Councilman Overstreet who was not in attendance. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> Councilman Dimond clarified that he voted yes as he felt <br /> legally this was the best alternative. <br /> 0 <br /> Discussion ensued regarding the interim ordinance and if a <br /> motion was needed regarding this now. Since September I is a <br /> couple of months away it was decided that no action was needed <br /> at this time. <br /> Councilman Moser requested that he review Allan Grit Con's list <br /> to <br /> reemmaent ke sure all issues were included. Everyone was in <br /> agwith this. <br /> C) <br /> C <br />