Laserfiche WebLink
610 0 <br /> November 6,1991 \ <br /> number <br /> Allan lifter, Planning, explained that the proposed amendments (. <br /> included a large 0 <br /> of housekeeping changes, changes <br /> that would increasethe flexibility of the code and a Pew <br /> changes that would decrease development potential. a further <br /> informed c ncilmembers that the proposed changes are <br /> separated <br /> into three separate ordinances: 1) C.B. 9110-66 <br /> restructuring of the definitions chapter and the addition of <br /> new definitions to the code; 2) C.B. 9110-67-changes to the <br /> use-standards tables of the code and; 3)C.B.9110-68-changes <br /> tothe written text of the cede, includina <br /> rezoneof <br /> approximately' BO acres s on Nast Casino Road. He also gave p <br /> ncilmembers a adding two definitions to the"long list" <br /> -ceaseand vacate. <br /> He stated that Staff recommended approving the amendments to <br /> the Zoning Code by adopting the three ordinances;however,they <br /> recommendedremoving the section "preservation of <br /> significant trees." He reminded cooncilmembers that several <br /> citizens are awaiting these changes as they have building <br /> permits pending. <br /> like s ttent peakr.owThaeskfeliowingheresxndetl.any citizens that would <br /> Pat Dunlap, 7523 Lower Ridge Road, Supported the change that <br /> �i <br /> increases the permitted height P accessory buildings from 15 Com/ <br /> feet to 21 feet,citing an example ofhavinga beat to shelter. <br /> Fiery Hale, 500 67th Street, spoke in favor of preservation of <br /> significant trees. She did have three areas of concern: <br /> 1) <br /> definition of"significant"; 2) perimeter landscapingwould n <br /> have margin of safety and; 3) the need for a brief review <br /> period after trees are marked. <br /> Mike aletzner, 11605 Highway 9 expressed that significant <br /> trees w n Issue that needed to be aedxeaeee antl recommended <br /> public input. <br /> Paul Roberts, Planning, informed co ncilmembers that several <br /> tlapartments re working together to u deal with the that. <br /> of (� <br /> significant trees keeping in mIndseveral facets: trees o <br /> private property,public property; new developments, etc. They <br /> workingare comprehensive policy t0 deal with these <br /> • <br /> issues. The comprehensive policy will then be referred t0 • <br /> various agencies, such , the Planning Commission, City <br /> Council,etc. as <br /> Councilman Over • suggested Council involvement in the S( <br /> process. Mayor 1. .asponded that he would be glad for <br /> Council's input. <br /> 0 <br />