Laserfiche WebLink
February 9,2000 <br /> recon facilities.This is one way for the Council to say what we mean and <br /> that we do want that area to be for resonation and a ballpark. <br /> Jim Iles,Assistant City Attorney,suggested that with the verbiage that <br /> Councilmember Warnock recommended it has to be 'accessory o <br /> r <br /> complementary to the preparation for ball fields'so there is already a limitation <br /> and by including-but not limited to'you include an opportunity to ensure that <br /> we do not boot strap ourselves in the future. <br /> Councilntentber Overstreet asked if a furore City Counc0/Adntisrnration could <br /> decide to change the uses,example-a park a.ride. Attorney Iles stated it <br /> would not be complimentary or accessory. <br /> Co cilmember Overstreet stated that he would'not be muomfonable with <br /> having the words"accessory or complementary"included.However he wanted <br /> to be nue that the minutes reflect due concern of the council. <br /> President Campbell indict.that the proposed original verbiage was limiting <br /> enough. <br /> Couscilmember Warnock stressed the shortage of ball fields in the...miry <br /> and if the uses of this property are broadened to uvea other dun the ball fields <br /> and aarasories that go with them then we are ahon changing ourselves. <br /> Mayor Hansen stated that the question is the precise legal interpretation of the <br /> language proposed.An example of another use that isn't listed would be Parks <br /> Depamnent maintenance facilities.There are other typos of potential uses that <br /> are tory or complimentary but are not listed. <br /> Couuswilmmber Pope called for the question on the amendment. <br /> Roll was called with all councilmembets voting yea except Councilmembers <br /> Anderson.Pope,Simpson,and Campbell who voted no. <br /> Motion defeated. <br />