2000/02/09 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Fabrsary 9,2000 0.The propomi changes to the M-I Zone for this property bear a substantial relation to public health,safety or welfare:and promote the best long teem interests of the Everett Community;and 9.The proposed rezone meets all of the criteria in Chapter 41.Subsection 160.4 of the Zoning Code. 10.The proposed rezone shall be implemented through a Development Agreement as provided in RCW 36.]00.1]0.......... Due to the length of this resolution it can be found In 10-entirety on file in the ay Clerk's Office. Councilmember Warnock clarified that through the Planning Commission process and through the public hearings it hes been very well stated that the purpose of this property is for recreation and ball fields. He questioned the verbiage in the recitals of du Development Agreement,Section D,and asked for assistance in creating verbiage to indicate that the purpose of this property is ft recreation and ball fields. He was concerned that in More years the purpose of the property could be changed sod that is not the intent. The verbiage"including but not linked"was of cotfom m him. Moved by Councllmemher Warnock, seconded by Cauadlmmber Overstreet to amend the verbiage hn Section D,page 2,of the Development Agreement(Exhibit 2),"for remotion and or ball fief.and any accessory or complimentary use thereto for open space,parking,utilities and slope support winch conveyance provides a public bandit to the Everett community.^ Mayor Hansen brought forth a legal concern and recommended including the original verbiage as recommended by the City Attorney. The problem being that if sometime in the fume there is a related use that has not been considered and specified then there could be a legal effect that 6 nal intended. Cou..citmember Overstreet sated that If recrem.m is important then perhaps the City Council does want to restrict this.South Everett is lacking in parks and 61