My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000/03/01 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
2000/03/01 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 3:07:02 PM
Creation date
9/29/2020 2:20:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
3/1/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
March 1,2000 <br /> • <br /> Glen Wells,architect.stated that multi use buildings are tough projects to <br /> develop.There will be 16,000 square fat of multi family use in this project. <br /> This proposed ordinance gives the developer more flexibility in making a mixed <br /> use project work. <br /> Canncilroember Warnock asked what the difference is between review processes <br /> 2 and 3. <br /> Dave Koenig answered that review process 3 requires a mandatory public <br /> hearing while with review process 2 there is notice of adjacent property with an <br /> optional public hearing. <br /> Coucihnember Warnock questioned if it will change this from a mandatory <br /> public hearing to an optional public hearing? <br /> Dave answered it will only change it th one use If a clinic is over 20,000 <br /> square feet and is a mixed-use building then it would he in review proems 2. <br /> The intent is to encourage mined um. <br /> Moved by Connnllmember Pope,seconded by CoundlmesoMr Grentreet to <br /> dose the public hearing. <br /> Roll was Called with all cou ncilmemberu voting yes except Counoilmember <br /> Anderson who was excused. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> 9a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.