My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000/01/26 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
2000/01/26 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 3:04:43 PM
Creation date
9/29/2020 2:22:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
1/26/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
January26,2000 <br /> at STREET SAFEWAY <br /> President Campbell stated that the City Council will resume its consideration of <br /> the Safeway proposal to amend the Comprehensive Plan and Remne together <br /> with the proposed stmt vacation of Terrace Drive(agenda items 7,8 and 9). <br /> The City Couscd previously took public testimony on these items and the public <br /> hearings were <br /> re closed.The purpose of the Council's consideration of this matter <br /> at this time to review Saf ay's responses to the City Counc0's concern that <br /> re expressed at the close of the October 20,1999 public bearing,to ask <br /> questions and to make a decision. <br /> The City Council's consideration of this matter mnst be fan in fact m wen Se <br /> appearance. At the beginning of the public hearings on February 17,1999, <br /> Councilman Wamack disclosed his observation of a Pluming Commission <br /> mashy involving this proposal. Then was no objection made to his <br /> puticiwtion. <br /> President Campbell disclosed that he was absent from the October 20,1999 <br /> City Council meeting.He stated that he has since listened to the tapes of that <br /> mating and reviewed information on public testimony.He question.whether <br /> anyone had an oblation to his participation.No one responded. <br /> He asked if any councielember knows of any conflict of interests or other <br /> reasons that may cause concent that have not previously been disclosed? No <br /> one responded. <br /> He asked if any member of dm public had aoy objection to his or any of the <br /> couneilmembera'participation.No one mpoaded. <br /> Dave Koenig,Planning,explained that eauncilmembara have the docmnems • <br /> relating to these agenda items. There was some confusion at this time. The <br /> Council mating recessed and reconvened. <br /> City Attorney Poke stat.that the City Council will be using today's agenda <br /> packet;however.he noted that mere is a page out of order.Pages 87 and 88 <br /> shoold follow page 68. <br /> 31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.