My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005/11/16 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
2005/11/16 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 3:45:48 PM
Creation date
9/29/2020 4:10:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
11/16/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
November 16,2005 <br /> Security's Office of Domestic Preparedness for the distribution of <br /> preparedness equipment. <br /> Roll was called with all council members voting yes. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> PUBLIC HEARING—NORTH MARINA REDEVELOPMENT <br /> President Krell opened a public hearing regarding a proposed resolution <br /> amending Resolution No.5382,and amending Exhibit C of Resolution No. <br /> 5382,the development agreement for the Port of Everett North Marina <br /> Redevelopment Planned Development Overlay Zone. <br /> President Krell stated that it is important that the public hearing is not only <br /> fair in fact but fair in appearance. She requested that each council <br /> member disclose whether or not they attended the story pole <br /> demonstration on October 8.2005,or if they otherwise viewed the story <br /> pole. Council Members Krell, Olson, Hatlae, Gipson. Nielsen, <br /> Stonecipher and Overstreet each disclosed that they had either attended <br /> the demonstration or viewed the story pole.Council Member Gipson also <br /> disclosed that he had discussed them as part of a conversation during his <br /> campaign for Mayor and had stated his position. <br /> President Krell questioned whether any council members knew of any real <br /> or potential conflict or concern with this matter that would cause that <br /> member to avoid participation in this hearing. <br /> Council Member Overstreet requested that the City Attorney review the <br /> criteria for making that decision.City Attorney Iles staled that it is based <br /> on whether or not the council members have had any ex parte contacts <br /> regarding the merits of the proposal and,if so,whether the council <br /> member is still able to maintain a fair and objective view of the matter. <br /> Council Member Overstreet stated that he had recused himself from the <br /> previous meeting regarding this matter due to concern that the public <br /> would feel that his decision would be biased. He remarked that even <br /> though he feels that he could be fair and objective in considering this <br /> 382 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.