Laserfiche WebLink
May 2,2007 <br /> Council Member Gipson voiced concern about discouraging creativity in <br /> using signs and questioned that major car dealers are out of compliance. <br /> Allan stated that the intent is to provide adequate signage but without <br /> distraction to motorists and the public. <br /> Council Member Olson questioned if there was input by car dealers. <br /> Gerry Ervine,Planning.answered that this has gone through the planning <br /> commission process and there have been no objections. <br /> Council Member Robeds recalled that there had been past discussions <br /> with auto dealers iregarding advertising and they were in agmement in <br /> how they wanted signage addressed. <br /> President Stonecipher asked for citizen comment.No one responded. <br /> Moved by Council Member Nielsen,seconded by Council Member <br /> Overstreet to close the public hearing. <br /> Roll was called with all council members voting yes except Council <br /> Member Hallos who was excused. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> COUNCIL BILL NO.0704-22 <br /> THIRD AND FINAL READING: <br /> AN ORDINANCE amending Section 36 of Ordinance Na.1671. <br /> 89,as amended,pertaining to the Sign Regulations of the <br /> Zoning Code(EMC Chapter 19.36) <br /> Moved by Council Member Nielsen.seconded by Council Member <br /> Roberts that this is declared to be the third and final reading of Council Bill <br /> No.0704-22 and the City Clerk was directed to call the roll for the final <br /> disposition of the ordinance as revised. <br /> 150 <br />