Laserfiche WebLink
August 13,2008 <br /> built in as amended would not allow these signs at all on streets that are <br /> not arterial street frontage.They would provide for the Planning Director <br /> the option to deny,and Implicit in that,would be the ci Sty to"condition" <br /> that sign.It it doesn't fit in this area it doesn't go forward unless it can be <br /> made more appropriate for that area.The other safeguards that are built <br /> in here are that this video board aspect does not cyst The hours of <br /> operation are between 10 p.m.end 6 a.m.This also pairs 8 down to only <br /> arterial street frontage with the ability to condhon. <br /> Council Member Gipson stated that he would eke to see the Planning <br /> Director have the authority to place certain conditions so that the <br /> institutions can succeed in their communications. <br /> Jim Iles,City Attorney,said that based upon Council Member Robeds <br /> amendment the Planning Director would have responsibility to address <br /> the aesthetics of the sign. <br /> Council Member Roberts clarified that the Planning Director shall have the <br /> authority to condition or deny the sign'.(friendly amendment) <br /> Council Member Olson agreed to this friendly amendment*. <br /> Moved by Council Member Gipson to amend the motion to allow the <br /> Planning Director to allow the sign to change more frequently than one <br /> time per hour. <br /> Motion died for lack of second. <br /> The City Clerk Is directed to call the roll for the final disposition of the <br /> ordinance including the friendly amendments. <br /> AYES: Roberts,Olson,Gipson,Stonecipher <br /> NAVES: Nielsen <br /> EXCUSED: Hatloe,Affhotter <br /> Ordinance No.S063AS adopted. <br /> 286 <br />