My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011/01/05 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
2011/01/05 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 4:03:44 PM
Creation date
9/29/2020 5:14:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
1/5/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
January 5,2011 <br /> BID CALL-2011 BIOSOLIDS REMOVAL <br /> To authorize a call for bids for the 2011 Biosolida Removal project <br /> Roll was called with all council members voting yes. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> BID AWARD—SEWER SYSTEM REPLACEMENT"L"NORTH AREA <br /> To award the construction contract and authorize the Mayor to sign the <br /> contact with Shoreline Construction, Inc. for the Sewer System <br /> Replacement"L"North Area project in the amount of$3,224,841.20. <br /> Dave Davis,Public Works,stated that this project was designed to help <br /> alleviate the basement flooding problem in north Everett around <br /> Providence Hospital and is needed for the opening of the hospital's tower <br /> in June. <br /> City Attorney Iles,Legal,stated that in this matter the council members <br /> have been provided with a copy of a protest filed by R.L Alia,the second <br /> lowest bidder,and a response from Shoreline Construction.He remarked <br /> that the council could handle the protest in various ways but <br /> recommended that they entertain it tonight. <br /> The council members concurred with his recommendation. <br /> Tim Benedict,Legal,remarked that the protest was fled due to the <br /> omission of the"base bid contract total"and the°alternate bid contract <br /> r <br /> toten Shoreline's bid proposal.He explained that the issue before the <br /> council is to determine if that protea(should be upheld or denied. The <br /> position of R.L.Alia is that the omission makes the bid non-responsive <br /> and non-binding and should be rejected. He cited the standard for <br /> deciding whether the omission is a material irregularity or an immaterial '• <br /> ., <br /> irregularity.He stated that it is the recommendation of the City Attorney's <br /> office that the protest be denied,that this be deemed an immaterial <br /> irregularity,and that the contact be awarded to Shoreline Construction. <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.