My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020/10/14 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2020
>
2020/10/14 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 2:25:12 PM
Creation date
10/19/2020 10:13:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
10/14/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
974
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EVALUATION FOR <br />AGENCY USE ONLY <br />g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the <br />site? <br />There are no shoreline designations on the site. <br />h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or the county? <br />If so, specify. <br />There are no wetland areas located on the site. There are mapped critical areas due to. <br />slopes and soil types. The perimeter along Grand Avenue is denoted on the City of <br />Everett Critical Areas Map as containing areas of "Erosion/Landslide Hazard". (See <br />the Geotechnical Engineering Report (Feb. 2020) submitted with this revised proposal <br />for additional detail.) <br />j• <br />Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? <br />The Docket Application request has no anticipated impact to this environmental <br />element. This proposal is limited to an evaluation of impacts related to a <br />comprehensive plan amendment request and concurrent rezone (with removal of the <br />HO) Impacts on Land and Shoreline Use (including number of residents/workers) <br />would be reviewed in conjunction with a future land -use proposal in accordance with <br />City development regulations. <br />Development consistent with the proposed designation would be related to residents <br />and based on the number of units developed per acre. The R-3 zone allows for up to <br />29 dwelling units per acre, which could allow up to 67 dwelling units on the entire site <br />(including the 7 SFRs in R-1). The possible total residents on the entire site could be <br />198 residents. Although no project is proposed with this request, development at the <br />mid -range of the multi -family designation could yield up to 50 units, which would <br />create a transition as it is below the allowed R-3 and R-4 densities that abut the site <br />(R-3 abuts on the north, and R-4 abuts on the east and southeast). Based on 2.97 <br />persons per household, potentially 148 residents would then reside on the site. <br />Housing Hope would propose this level of development for the site. The revised 2020 <br />proposal has provided a conceptual site plan (see Figure 4) with 44 units, which could <br />yield 131 residents. The proposal now would be a mix of both R-1 (western -third) and <br />R-3 (eastern two-thirds) to provide continuity across the site and housing density <br />transition with the neighboring properties. <br />Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? <br />The Docket Application request has no anticipated impact to this environmental <br />element This proposal is limited to an evaluation of impacts related to a <br />comprehensive plan amendment request and concurrent rezone (with removal of the <br />HO). <br />There are no existing residences on -site. Potential future displacement would be <br />related to the removal of the informal grass field fiom community use. <br />k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: <br />Environmental Checklist — Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Concurrent Rezone 29 <br />AUGUST 2020 REv'D <br />BRENT PLANNING SOLUTIONS, LLC FOR HOUSING HOPE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.