My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020/10/14 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2020
>
2020/10/14 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 2:25:12 PM
Creation date
10/19/2020 10:13:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
10/14/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
974
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EVALUATION FOR <br />AGENCY USE ONLY <br />the same lots; and a request for the Development Agreement for the entire site. This <br />would allow inclusion of single-family and multi -family units wherein it is anticipated <br />that the structures would not be more than two-story buildings (m the SFR R-1 zone), <br />with design reflective of the historic character of the neighborhood and requirements <br />of the historic overlay - with the exception of height in the R-3/removed HO zone, <br />which would be 3-story multi -family buildings designed to honor the spirit of the <br />historic neighborhood. The current conceptual site plan (see Figure 4) contains seven <br />single-family residences and four multi -family buildings (44 dwelling units and 96 <br />sleeping rooms total). <br />Residents would be supported by Housing Hope programs/staff, which would assist <br />them in removing barriers to employment and increased income. The program goal is <br />for the family to achieve self-sufficiency and to escape poverty and homelessness. <br />Students would also be supported by Housing Hope staff to achieve success in school <br />and break the cycle of intergenerational poverty. The program as designed does meet <br />the definition of supportive housing; however, due to a recent moratorium issued by <br />the Everett City Council, it is unclear if this site would meet the definition in the future. <br />b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether <br />high, middle, or low-income housing. <br />There are no housing units on the Subject Site. <br />c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: <br />The Docket Application request has no anticipated impact to this environmental <br />element. This proposal is limited to an evaluation of impacts related to a <br />comprehensive plan amendment request and concurrent rezone (with removal of the <br />HO). Impacts on Housing (including housing impacts/reduction) would be reviewed <br />in conjunction with a future land -use proposal in accordance with City development <br />regulations. <br />Any future development of the site would have to go through various permits from the <br />City. At that time, there would be a review of potential impacts related to traffic, <br />drainage, and other site development impacts. Any future development must address <br />Neighborhood Conservation Guidelines and Historic Overlay Zone Standards for the <br />Norton -Grand Historic Overlay (HO) zone. The proposal is to remove the HO on the <br />requested R-3 zoned lots (eastern two-thirds of the site), with a Development <br />Agreement proposed to require consistency with the HO design intent on the entire <br />site. Multi -family structures require greater height, which is restricted by the HO. A <br />Development Agreement is proposed for the entire site to ensure that historic design <br />features and project components enhance and compliment the neighborhood <br />10. AESTHETICS <br />a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; <br />what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? <br />Environmental Checklist — Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Concurrent Rezone 45 <br />BRENT PLANNING SOLUTIONS, LLC FOR HOUSING HOPE AUGUST 2020 REV'D <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.