2020/10/14 Council Agenda Packet

D. Supplemental sheet for non -project actions 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? There would be no increased discharge to water; emissions to air, production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise as a result of an amendment request for a change in the Comprehensive Plan land use map and rezone to a consistent implementing zone on the eastern portion of the site. This proposal is limited to an evaluation of impacts related to this request. As a non -project action impacts on water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise would be reviewed in conjunction with a future land -use proposal in accordance with City development regulations. There would be impacts associated with the increased density allowed by the rezone. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: There would be no impact related to the non -project action; therefore, there are no mitigation measures being proposed. At the project level stage review would be conducted by the City related to development regulations and potential mitigation requirements. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The proposed Docketing Application request has no anticipated impact to this environmental element. This proposal is limited to an evaluation of impacts related to a comprehensive plan amendment request and concurrent rezone. A consistency determination would be required as part of the docketing process and City Council action. The site was developed with Jackson Elementary School (1902-1955). It contains a maintained field area and provides limited vegetation and habitat on much of the site with the exception of the treed area along the south/east. This proposal is limited to an evaluation of impacts related to this request. As a non -project action, impacts on plants, animals, fish, or marine life would be reviewed in conjunction with a future land -use proposal in accordance with City development regulations. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants,_ animals, fish, or marine life are: There would be no impact related to the non -project action; therefore, there are no mitigation measures being proposed. At the pzoject-level stage review would be conducted by the City related to development regulations and potential mitigation requirements related to plant and animals. There would be a Loss of minimal habitat with future development. Landscaping of the site would need to meet City code requirements. • 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The proposal is unlikely to deplete energy or natural resources. The proposed Docketing Application is to amend the Comprehensive Plan. Map to allow future development consistent with Environmental Checklist — Comprehensive Plan Anzendnzent/Concurrent Rezone 59 BRENT PLANNING SOLUTIONS, LLC FOR HOUSING HOPE AUGUST 2020 REv'D