My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance 3769-20
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 3769-20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2020 11:00:58 AM
Creation date
11/16/2020 10:57:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Ordinances
Ordinance Number
3769-20
Date
9/23/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
be amended into two separate actions. Mr. Giffen responded the Commission has the discretion to <br /> make amendments to the Resolution. <br /> Motion: Commissioner Zelinski made a motion to approve Planning Commission Resolution 20-01 with <br /> the removal of Finding 5 on page 2 from the Resolution. Commissioner McGinn seconded the motion, <br /> Vote: Commissioner McGinn,yes;Commissioner Zelinski,yes;Commissioner Beck, no;Commissioner <br /> Tisdel, no; Commissioner Holland,abstain;Commissioner Lavra,yes; and Chair Yanasak,yes. <br /> Motion Carried. <br /> Item 2: Evergreen Recovery Center <br /> Karen Stewart, Environmental Planner, presented information on the Evergreen Recovery Center <br /> request fora comprehensive plan map and rezone change. <br /> Commission Discussion <br /> Commissioner Lark asked about the applicant's public outreach. Linda Grant,Evergreen Recovery <br /> Center CEO,stated that they notified the neighborhood and were invited to the neighborhood meeting; <br /> however,the meeting was cancelled due to COVID. She also met with the County Councilman for that <br /> district. Commissioner Lark asked if the community would be considered in the design of the facility. <br /> Ms. Grant responded that they would and have designed the center to be compatible with the <br /> neighborhood. They have a great relationship with the neighborhood. <br /> Citizen Comments <br /> Tina Hokanson stated that the proposal sounds like a great project. <br /> Susan Secor, E. Grand Avenue,stated that the rezone request would provide for a development <br /> agreement that hasn't been formed. She was concerned with the wording used by the applicant which <br /> said: "The uses are limited to things we expect with this project, including but not limited to.. ." She felt <br /> that the wording leaves the door open for any use allowed in the C-1 zone. <br /> Commission Discussion <br /> Commissioner Finch asked about the percentage of clients from Everett as opposed to broader <br /> Snohomish County. Ms. Grant responded 50-60%are Everett residents. <br /> Commissioner Lavra stated that the site was well maintained and a reasonable project for the area. <br /> Commissioner Lark asked about funding and/or grant restrictions. Ms. Grant responded most of their <br /> clients are funded out of the Medicaid healthcare plan, and they also contract with other health care <br /> plans for the northwest region. <br /> Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 4 <br /> June 16,2020 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.