My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3003 W CASINO RD BLDG 40-41 2020-11-24
>
Address Records
>
W CASINO RD
>
3003
>
BLDG 40-41
>
3003 W CASINO RD BLDG 40-41 2020-11-24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/24/2020 1:20:19 PM
Creation date
11/24/2020 1:19:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
W CASINO RD
Street Number
3003
Tenant Name
BLDG 40-41
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
January 4, 2019 <br /> SUBMITTAL REVIEW Greenberry—Specification Section 23 65 14.15 <br /> Boeing Bldg. 40-04&40-41 Cooling Towers Replacement <br /> Sazan Project No. 543-1898 <br /> External Ladders and X No Exceptions at this <br /> Service Handrails time. However, please <br /> Platform be aware of updates to <br /> Boeing ladder and fall <br /> protection requirements <br /> and potential <br /> modifications. (Arch— <br /> EC) <br /> Steel Support X No Exceptions <br /> Configuration (Structural—KS) <br /> Copies returned with review: [1]email+ [0]drawings <br /> NOTES: <br /> 1. All submittal review action, by the reviewer, is included on this"Submittal Review" <br /> Document. Marks on the reviewed material shall not be considered a part of the <br /> review unless specifically referenced here. Contractor shall attach a copy of the <br /> review to all portions extracted from the submittal. <br /> 2. This purpose of this review is to assure general conformance with the design <br /> concept and contract documents. Review comments shall not be construed to be <br /> directives to change the contract requirements and Contractor shall contact <br /> reviewer or offer a Change Proposal if it is perceived that the review conflicts with <br /> contract requirements. Contractor is responsible to verify suitability of information <br /> that pertains to manufacturing processes, interface with job site conditions, means <br /> of construction and methods of construction. <br /> 3. Definitions: <br /> • No Exceptions: Subject to the qualifications and remarks(if any)in the <br /> "Comments"column,the item is considered to be satisfactory for incorporation <br /> into the project. <br /> • Correct: Make changes noted in the"Comments"column; re-submittal not <br /> required. <br /> • Rejected: Reviewer has reviewed the item and the item is determined to be <br /> unsatisfactory for the reason(s)listed in"Comments." Correct&Resubmit <br /> item. <br /> • Architect: Item is known to require selection of finish(configuration,color, <br /> texture, etc.)by Architect and review shall not be complete until this is done. <br /> 4. Voltage and Phase: Submitter shall verify voltage and phase to be suitable for the <br /> project. <br /> Page 3 4T <br /> C <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.