2020/12/16 Council Agenda Packet

# Recommendation / Rationale Anticipated Timeframe 22 local Aggressively 787 base effort fruition. line business in now, closure Everett in expand is to a grow our both a economic a stronger should with wake-up local strategize tax base call businesses, base in and addition an on in the opportunity. how but future. to to it diversify will aerospace. We take The should City The employment and Boeing come the this to Long -Term our years community partnership start to 23 Provide vital Aggressive City a revenues means, ahead, livable with impacting with us strong we budget city for for cost are to neighborhoods concerned decisions promote City. could values But a need in about strong and further and this and to it asking economy. also our a economic be harm healthy ability highlights the with to climate, downtown This vitality attract this the for peril of a of population businesses. money. City, generate the next few of Long-term recommendation with in new our reasons property the many cutting resonates years. negatively A healthy modest Moving will taxpayers more mind. made Category: Public Information 24 Track between with data supplements), average residents employees. officers and qualified are is that control the rarely a includes publication be and notably salaries and City city increase — nearly growth employees households skills of twice transparency of City as secure data employees as many are a and those visible household who high specialized terms the a of Everett the not the are employees wage, income. working the and general change benefit of salary higher without market sector mind in (including workforce. The (relying private the and population. comparison.• many for median than Like diversity on sector attract the but federal of in While leaders these household and comparisons Everett income the and retain do for is income the to sector, a City Police expect City's to City Ongoing start now. - low which hard in of making median City somewhat in to said, not need Fire offerings we are distorts as City in costs. competitive more and That limited private we facts, case peer to Police not the median employer much the of the think median The Firefighters) operates generous employees. highly In labor front benefits, of helpful City employers, public diverse will working the as many of also may it City described Attachment C to this report presents the above recommendations in summary form. As noted above, we have not had an opportunity to dive deeply into the implementation and expected financial outcome of our recommendations. For this reason, our recommendations are posed as ideas we support for further exploration by the City. Pursuing all 24 ideas presented above would require an enormous amount of time and expense by the City and is simply not feasible. Realistically, the Mayor and Council will need to prioritize where they focus their energies. Success will also require a measure of luck —to the extent that changing state laws and securing public support for change is never a certainty. 20