Laserfiche WebLink
Please also sec the findings for Item(12)in the next section. <br /> Conclusion: The proposed WCF would result in additional antennas mounted on <br /> the rooftop,which would be more visible than the existing antennas as a result of <br /> an increase in size. The proposed facility would not block views or create light <br /> and shadow impacts on abutting properties because of its relatively small size and <br /> separation from the nearest structures. <br /> The proposed wireless communication facility can be designed to be compatible <br /> with the surrounding properties. It should be painted or colored to match the <br /> exterior of the hospital building in order to blend in and reduce visual impacts. <br /> 6. The number,size and location of signs,especially as they relate to more <br /> sensitive land uses. <br /> Finding: No signage is proposed. <br /> Conclusion: Not applicable. <br /> 7. The landscaping,buffering and screening of buildings,parking,loading and <br /> storage areas,especially as they relate to more sensitive land uses. <br /> Finding: No additional buildings,parking, loading or storage areas arc proposed. <br /> Conclusion: Additional landscaping,buffering and screening will not be <br /> necessary,provided the proposed antennas arc paintcd or colored to match the <br /> color of the existing building. <br /> 8. The generation of nuisance irritants such as noise,smoke,dust,odor, glare, <br /> visual blight or other undesirable impacts. <br /> Finding: 'File proposed facility is unmanned and would not generate any noise, <br /> dust,smoke or other nuisance impacts. <br /> Conclusion: No nuisance irritants or other undesirable impacts are anticipated as <br /> a result of the proposal. <br /> 9. Consistency with the goals and policies of the Everett General Plan for the <br /> area and land use designation in which the property is located. <br /> Finding: The site is designated 2.4, Hospital,on the City of Everett's <br /> Comprehensive Plan map. The Comprehensive Plan contains a policy that <br /> encourages co-location of utilities, where possible, in order to minimize <br /> proliferation of utility structures and environmental disturbance. The proposal <br /> involves use of an existing, non-residential structure for support,rather than a new <br /> ( -° <br /> r <br />