Laserfiche WebLink
Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard,and <br /> Snohomish County YMCA Geotechnical Engineering Report <br /> Everett, Washington Design Recommendations <br /> III. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> 8.0 INTRODUCTION <br /> Our explorations indicate that, from a geotechnical engineering standpoint, the proposed <br /> project is feasible provided the recommendations contained herein are properly followed. <br /> A portion of the site is underlain by existing fill, which necessitates full removal under areas of <br /> new foundations. Observed fill thicknesses near the proposed building ranged from 0.5 to 4.5 <br /> feet. The following report sections provide additional recommendations regarding site <br /> preparation, grading,foundations, floor support, and drainage. <br /> 9.0 SITE PREPARATION <br /> Existing structures, paving, buried utilities, vegetation, topsoil, and any other deleterious <br /> materials should be removed where they are located below planned construction areas. All <br /> disturbed soils resulting from demolition activities should be removed to expose underlying <br /> undisturbed native sediments and replaced with structural fill, as needed. All excavations <br /> below final grade made for demolition activities should be backfilled, as needed, with <br /> structural fill. Erosion and surface water control should be established around the clearing <br /> limits to satisfy local requirements. <br /> Once demolition has been completed, existing fill should be addressed.The observed thickness <br /> of existing fill ranged approximately 0.5 to 4.5 feet near the proposed new building. We <br /> recommend that existing fill below new foundation and slabs-on-grade areas, if encountered, <br /> be removed and replaced with structural fill. <br /> Below planned on-site paving, existing fill should be exposed, proof-rolled, and compacted to <br /> 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density. If a firm and unyielding condition is <br /> achieved, no further remedial preparation would be needed. If yielding conditions are <br /> encountered, existing fill would be partially removed and replaced with imported structural fill. <br /> The depth of replacement of the existing fill below paving should be determined at the time of <br /> construction when field conditions are known. <br /> 9.1 Temporary Cut Slopes <br /> In our opinion, stable construction slopes should be the responsibility of the contractor and <br /> should be determined during construction. For estimating purposes, however, temporary, <br /> unsupported cut slopes can be planned at 1.5H:1V (Horizontal:Vertical) in unsaturated existing <br /> fill sediments and Vashon advance outwash sediments. Temporary slopes of 1H:1V can be <br /> February26,2018 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES,INC. <br /> AWR/ms-170671E001-2-Projects1201706711KEIWP Page 10 <br />