8417 EVERGREEN WAY 2022-05-23 - Laserfiche WebLink

0 • 27.The response is not sufficient.The response has only addressed the portion of the comment regarding post-installed anchorage. Calculations for the design of the cast-in holdown anchors shall be submitted for review per the criteria stated in the original comment. 31.The response is not clear.The structural calculations appear to provide conflicting designs.The comment shall clarify the design intent of both pages 71 and 80. 32.The response is not clear.The response does not appear to address the comment, including referencing joists instead of the roof trusses. 33.The response is not clear and should be revised to clearly indicate how it addressed the comment. 35.The response is not sufficient.The following shall be addressed: a.The referenced calculations pages 100b through 100d have not been provided. b.The response states that wind controls the design.This does not appear likely given that the heaviest units weight up to 1,500 lbs. c. Deails for supplemental framing and anchorage have not been provided. 36.The response is not sufficient.The response references the response to Comment 35,which does not address Comment 36. 40. Detail 5/S-1.2 still shows the framing as metal stud walls"by others".These walls are not included in the deferred submittal on Sheet S-1.0. In addition, it is noted that Details 11/S1.3, referenced on Sheet S-2.0, and 9/S-1.1 and C/S-3.1, referenced on Sheet S-2.1, all indicate the interior walls to be wood-framed construction. Please let me know if you have questions. Drew Martin, P.E.,S.E. LiAssociate Engineer—Commercial Plans Examiner I Permit Services 425.257.8813 13200 Cedar Street, 2nd Floor, Everett,WA 98201 EVERETT Hours: Monday—Friday 7:30am-12:00pm and 1:00pm-4:00pm everettwa.gov I Facebook I Twitter Note:Emails and attachments sent to and from the City of Everett are public records and may be subject to disclosure pursuant to the Public Records Act. 2 /CG