Laserfiche WebLink
CEREBRATE LAW, PLLC <br />March 3, 2021 <br />Everett City Council <br />2930 Wetmore Avenue <br />Suite 9-A <br />Everett, WA 98201 <br />Dear Everett City Councilmembers, <br />am contacting you regarding the proposed legislation, Council Bill 2102-06, an ordinance prohibiting <br />certain conduct within designated rights of way. This ordinance does nothing to address the unique <br />needs of individuals within the City's houseless population while targeting the most vulnerable members <br />of the community for arbitrary enforcement of criminal codes by people who lack the knowledge, <br />training, and empathy to effectively help these people rise from their current state of impoverishment <br />and exclusion from housing. <br />The criminalization of homelessness is the scourge of the criminal justice system. Measures like the <br />above proposed Council Bill increase houseless residents' interaction within the justice system, while <br />providing no tangible benefits to anyone from the local community. These measures degrade the <br />relationships between law enforcement and their overpoliced populations, while the measures waste <br />valuable resources and time that could otherwise provide housing to area houseless populations. <br />It is the City's obligation to provide housing to all of its residents. The City's failed to meet Washington <br />State's 2005 goal of ending homelessness by 2015 (RCW 43.185C.005), and the City's own failure to <br />meet the needs of its population should not be directed towards concerted efforts arbitrarily selecting <br />the most vulnerable members of the community for additional traumatization and exclusion. <br />Moreover, these measures target organized efforts to address the conditions that houseless individual <br />live within on your streets by criminalizing constitutionally protected activities like assisting a houseless <br />person. The establishment of a permit to engage in constitutionally protected activities is likewise a <br />violation of the First Amendment along with Article I, Section 5 of the Washington Constitution. <br />While these measures violate our constitutional protections to due process, equal protection under the <br />law, and proscriptions against cruel and unusual punishment, they also come with price tags. As the City <br />looks toward enforcement of the unconstitutional and inhumane treatment under the law, these <br />legislative measures are not a financially viable means of obtaining full housing of all residents. Instead, <br />it is an unimaginative use of the State's police power, which is provided to local governments for the <br />health and welfare of the general population. Arbitrarily selecting a group for unequal treatment under <br />the law is proscribed by the State and Federal Constitutions. <br />Professor Sara Rankin of the Homeless Rights Advocacy Project at Seattle University School of Law <br />released a report on the financial costs for criminalizing homelessness in Seattle and Spokane. <br />"Generally, the baseline costs of criminalization ordinances can be placed into three categories: <br />(1) policing, which includes citation and arrest costs; <br />(2) adjudication, which includes judicial, prosecution, and defense costs; and <br />(3) incarceration, which includes daily bed and medical costs." <br />Re: Council Bill 2102-06 Page 1 <br />