Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> Estimate of Aerial Extent of Contamination <br /> The aerial extent of the contaminated soil was interpolated from the boring and laboratory data. <br /> For our estimate, we assumed that the limit of Class 3 contaminated soil was approximately <br /> midway between the "contaminated" (i.e., borings where samples were tested and found to be <br /> above MTCA cleanup levels) and"clean" (i.e., borings where samples were tested and found to be <br /> below MTCA cleanup levels) borings. For the sake of simplicity, we also assumed that the lateral <br /> extent of contamination formed a rectangular distribution. The actual lateral extent of <br /> contamination almost certainly forms an irregular shape and may include lobes that extend between <br /> the "clean" borings. For these reasons, there is a significant amount of uncertainty in our estimate, <br /> and the actual lateral extent of contamination may be larger or smaller than that estimated. <br /> For estimating the lateral extent of Class 2 soils, we included the entire aerial extent estimated for <br /> Class 3 soils plus an area of 40 feet by 40 feet surrounding boring EB-10. <br /> Estimated Thickness of Contaminated Soil over the Contaminated Area <br /> Class 3 soils were found in two borings,, EB-5 ancLEB77. The thickness of this contaminated zone <br /> was approximately 15 feet in boring EB-5 and 20 feet in boring EB-7. For our estimate, we <br /> assumed a contaminated soil thickness across the aerial extent of contamination that was equal to <br /> the average of these two thicknesses (i.e., 17.5 feet). Because the actual thickness of contaminated <br /> soil is reduced to zero at the limits of the contaminated zone, this estimate may be conservatively <br /> high. We also assumed a maximum excavation depth of 35 feet. Based on the existing data, it <br /> appears that this would include removal of all Class 3 soil, but not all Class 2 soil. <br /> Class 2 soils were found in three borings: EB-5, EB-7, and EB-10. The thickness of Class 2 soils <br /> at each of these boring locations was estimated to be those soils outside of the Class 3 soil zone that <br /> either exhibited detectable concentrations of petroleum constituents below MTCA cleanup levels, or <br /> (where no test data was available) where field screening indicated the presence of some petroleum <br /> (i.e., odors or elevated PID measurements). The thickness of Class 2 soils across the impacted area <br /> was then assumed to be equal to the average thickness encountered in the three borings. <br /> Estimation of Trucking Costs <br /> The volume of soil in place in the ground is commonly referred to as "bank yardage." During <br /> I excavation bulking or fluffing of the soil occurs resulting in increased volume. The volume of <br /> excavated soil is typically referred to as "truck yardage." For estimation of trucking costs, we <br /> assumed that 1 truck cubic yard = 1.3 bank cubic yards. Trucking costs for disposal of the <br /> contaminated soil were estimated assuming a trucking rate of$120 per hour for a 20 cubic yard <br /> truck and trailer load and a 1-hour round trip time per truck, including loading and unloading. <br /> Weight of Contaminated Soil <br /> I The tonnage of contaminated soil was estimated using an assumed soil unit weight of 150 pounds <br /> per cubic foot (2.025 tons per bank cubic yard). <br /> 2 <br />