Laserfiche WebLink
' � � <br /> Finding: The faei!dy is unmanne�l znd lherefore dces nct reqwre any �;errar.�:n; on-;�,e p�r�irg Or- <br /> street park ng and limited a!IB� UJA �s availaLie fcr shcrt term ma,rt�nance vehicles <br /> 5. Compatibilify of proposed structures and improvements uvith surrounding pro��erties, including <br /> the size, heighl, location, setbacle and arrangement of all proposed buildings and facili:ies, <br /> especially as they relate to liyht and shadow impacts on more sensitive land uses and less <br /> intensi•de zones. <br /> Findinq: The sde is the adjacent to an alley in a neighborhood comprised primarily of inedium densit�� <br /> multi-family land uses, along wilh cemmerciai, single famdy and duplexes also nearby. The proposal <br /> dees rot change the loca5on cr height of the existing facdity, therefore no impacts are anticipated <br /> 6. The number, size and location of signs, especially as they relate to more sensitive land uses. <br /> Findinq: No s�gnage is proposed at this fime, however any ne�v signage will require a sign permit <br /> ccmpliant•.vith the C,ty of Everett Zoning Code. <br /> 7. The landscapinc�, buNering and screening of buildings, parking, loading and storac�e areas, <br /> especia{ly as they relate to more sensitive land uses. <br /> Findinq: No screenicg is needed as tre equipn�.ent i� locab:d �.v�lhin ti�.e budd�ng adjacFnt (o !ne pcla <br /> 8. The generation of nuisance irritants such as noise, smolce, dust, odor, glare, visual biight or <br /> other undesirabie impacts. <br /> Finding: The ,r,roposed fac�ldy is unmanned and does not create signdicant nuisances. <br /> 9. Consistency with the goals and policies of the Everett General Plan for the area and land use <br /> designation in �vhich the property is located. <br /> Finding: The site is designated R•4 zoning and 1.7 comprehensive plan, Lo'h of�,�f�ich are mUltipie <br /> family designations. <br /> 10. Compliance with the provisions of this �jrdinance and other City, 5tatc and Federal re�ulations. <br /> Finding: A.'I necessary budding ar.d associated permits must te obtained for the proposal ri�cr ;o <br /> construction. <br /> 11. Accessibility to public transit, and tra(fic r��!�ction measures proposed by the applicant to <br /> reduce dependence of the proposed use on the a::tontobile. <br /> Findin9: The faul�ty is w��manned. <br /> SPU SPECIFIC EVALUATION CRITERIA: <br /> Seclion 19.41.150(D)(1)(c) EMC eontains speciflc evaluaticn r.nteria `er above yround uhlity and <br /> communiwtion facilities. Many of these cnteria are intended to address new or expanded utility slractures and <br /> do not apply to this application. <br /> DECI510N: The proposal is approved as submitied sub;ect to compliance v✓ith all city, state and federal <br /> regulations. The following conditions shall apply <br /> 1. A building pem�it is required for the antenna instaliation. <br />