My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8525 EVERGREEN WAY BURGER KING 2021-05-10
>
Address Records
>
EVERGREEN WAY
>
8525
>
BURGER KING
>
8525 EVERGREEN WAY BURGER KING 2021-05-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2021 11:25:55 AM
Creation date
5/4/2021 10:41:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
EVERGREEN WAY
Street Number
8525
Tenant Name
BURGER KING
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
295
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br /> • The proposed grading and bioretention underdrainage would not preserve <br /> the existing basin boundaries for Basin A and Basin B, as documented in <br /> the Drainage Report. Update the plans and/or report as needed for <br /> consistency. <br /> Bioretention is no longer proposed. See new plan set. <br /> • The grading in the northern potion of the project site would result in little <br /> or no flow to the proposed bioretention facility in the northern portion of <br /> the site. <br /> • Specify actual curb locations and grading in the grading plan that <br /> will provide the drainage patterns as documented in the Drainage <br /> Report. Showing simplified even spacing of curb cuts, without <br /> review of resulting drainage patters, or deferring the decision to the <br /> contractor regarding where specifically to locate curb cuts is not <br /> acceptable unless it is demonstrated in the design plans,report, <br /> and/or specifications that the installed conditions would provide <br /> the intended drainage patterns. See related comments above <br /> regarding bypass areas and modeling of BMP effectiveness. <br /> Bioretention is no longer proposed. See new plan set. <br /> • Review curb cut locations throughout and optimize for effective collection <br /> of runoff. Several curb cut locations shown would not effectively receive <br /> flow and several areas where curb cuts are needed do not have curb cuts <br /> provided. <br /> Bioretention is no longer proposed. See new plan set. <br /> • Downspout Infiltration Trenches: <br /> • Per comments on the Drainage Report, size the downspout <br /> infiltration trenches in accordance with Downspout Full Infiltration <br /> (BMP T5.10A) in the SWMMWW. Document the feasibility and <br /> sizing section MR#5 of the Drainage Report and ensure the <br /> facility size and configuration matches that sizing. <br /> Infiltration Trenches are no longer proposed. See new Drainage <br /> Report. <br /> • Cow-tongue dispersion splash blocks are shown in the plan view, <br /> which would allow roof runoff to enter bioretention facilities;but <br /> the documentation indicates that all roof runoff would be directed <br /> to separate downspout infiltration trenches. The designs and <br /> documentation conflict and must be resolved. <br /> PO Box 1478 • Everett, WA 98206 • Phone: (425) 303-9363 <br /> Fax: (425)303-9362 • Email:info@insightengineering.net <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.