My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8525 EVERGREEN WAY BURGER KING 2021-05-10
>
Address Records
>
EVERGREEN WAY
>
8525
>
BURGER KING
>
8525 EVERGREEN WAY BURGER KING 2021-05-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2021 11:25:55 AM
Creation date
5/4/2021 10:41:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
EVERGREEN WAY
Street Number
8525
Tenant Name
BURGER KING
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
295
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii. The geotechnical report does not appear to address Site Suitability Criteria <br /> (SSC)—6 in Vol. III Section 3.3.7. Documentation of Cation Exchange <br /> Capacity and organic content are required unless a treatment sand layer is <br /> included in the pavement section. See DCSS Section 4-4.3(5) and the <br /> permeable pavement design requirements in the Stormwater Management <br /> Manual. <br /> A sand treatment layer is now proposed to meet required Cation Exchange <br /> Capacity. See Figure 1/C3. <br /> iv. PGHS Area figure-the hatching for new and replaced PGHS do not show <br /> up for Basin A. <br /> The PGHS figure has been revised and now shows the hatching for Basin <br /> A. See PGHS Area figure in the drainage report(the second figure <br /> following page 18). <br /> v. Note that at the end of the geotechnical report text seals of the authors are <br /> cut off. <br /> The page has been fixed, and the authors seals are now shown. Please see <br /> the geotechnical report in Appendix A of the drainage report. <br /> b. Drawings <br /> i. Sheet C2.0—the limits of the permeable pavement, and bioretention if it is <br /> added, areas should be identified on this sheet for Element#13 <br /> protections. Identify the required measures to protect these areas in the <br /> plans, in addition to the notes. <br /> The limits of the permeable pavement have been shown on sheet C2.0 and <br /> fencing has been proposed for Element#13 to protect the area. See sheet <br /> 2.0 Element#13. <br /> ii. Sheet C.2.0—There is insufficient detail to determine the grading within <br /> the permeable pavement area. (It appears that the grading elements may <br /> have been turned off prior to printing). In accordance with Section 4- <br /> 4.3(5) of the City's Design and Construction Standards and Specifications <br /> (DCSS)the permeable pavement must be graded to drain as if it were not <br /> permeable. Please provide sufficient grading detail to demonstrate that the <br /> new/replaced pavement will drain properly in the event of failure. <br /> Spot elevations have been added. See sheet 2.0. <br /> P® Box 1478 • Everett, WA 98206 • Phone: (425)303-9363 <br /> Fax: (425) 303-9362 • Email:info@insightengineering.net <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.