Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> • <br /> • <br /> • APPENDIX A <br /> • FIELD EXPLORATIONS <br /> • <br /> • GENERAL <br /> • We drilled three borings at the site (B-1 through B-3)to investigate subsurface conditions. The <br /> borings were drilled to depths ranging from 51.5 to 56.5 feet BGS. The drilling was performed <br /> • by Holocene Drilling, Inc. of Puyallup, Washington. The drilling was observed by a member of <br /> our geotechnical staff. We obtained representative samples of the various soil encountered in <br /> • the explorations for visual classification and possible future laboratory testing. Classifications <br /> • and sampling depths are presented on the exploration logs included in this appendix. <br /> • The approximate locations of our explorations are shown on Figure 2. Exploration locations <br /> • were selected by GeoDesign based on the proposed development plans. The locations of the <br /> explorations were recorded using a GPS application on a smartphone. This information should <br /> • be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the methods used. <br /> • SOIL SAMPLING <br /> • Representative soil samples were obtained from the borings using the following methods: <br /> • • SPTs were performed in general conformance with ASTM D 1586. The sampler was driven <br /> • with a 140-pound automatic trip hammer free-falling 30 inches. The number of blows <br /> • required to drive the sampler 1 foot, or as otherwise indicated, into the soil is shown <br /> adjacent to the sample symbols on the exploration logs. Disturbed samples were obtained <br /> • from the split barrel sampler for subsequent classification and index testing. <br /> • • Shelby tube samples were collected in general accordance with ASTM D 1587. The 2.5-foot <br /> long, 3-inch-diameter, thin-walled, seamless steel tubes were pushed into the soil in one <br /> • continuous stroke. Each tube, together with the encased soil, was removed from the ground <br /> • and sealed. <br /> • The average efficiency of the automatic SPT hammer used by Holocene Drilling, Inc. was <br /> 77.0 percent. A copy of the calibration testing is presented at the end of this appendix. <br /> • <br /> • SOIL CLASSIFICATION <br /> • The soil samples were classified in accordance with the "Exploration Key" (Table A-1) and "Soil <br /> Classification System" (Table A-2), which are included in this appendix. The exploration logs <br /> • indicate the depths at which the soils or their characteristics change, although the change could <br /> • be gradual. A horizontal line between soil types indicates an observed (visual or digging action) <br /> • change. If the change occurred between sample locations and was not observed or obvious, the <br /> depth was interpreted and the change is indicated using a dashed line. Classifications and• <br /> sampling intervals are presented on the exploration logs included in this appendix. <br /> • <br /> • LABORATORY TESTING <br /> • We visually examined soil samples obtained from the explorations to confirm field classifications. <br /> • We also performed the following laboratory testing. <br /> • <br /> • <br /> • G EODESIGN= A-1 Polygon-128-01:09161 5 <br />