Laserfiche WebLink
REVIEW COMMENT 3 <br /> Additional deep borings should be drilled at the site, particularly on the eastern side of the site <br /> where the development will be close to the river bank. The available borings located east of <br /> Eclipse Mill Road (B-102 and B-103) terminate prematurely in soils that are not confirmed to be <br /> increasing in density, and which may be potentially liquefiable. The standard of practice is not to <br /> terminate borings until consistently higher blow counts are observed in non-liquefiable soils, and <br /> to a depth of at least 50 feet. Both borings B-102 and B-103 were terminated in potentially loose <br /> to medium dense sand below the water table. We recommend additional borings be performed <br /> at each building location (or at least every other building if soils show some consistency)east of <br /> Eclipse Mill Road given the heterogeneous nature of the fill materials and the underlying native <br /> compressible silt and liquefiable sand layers. Borings should extend at least 50 feet deep or well <br /> into non-liquefiable sand deposits, whichever is deeper. <br /> RESPONSE TO REVIEW COMMENT 3 <br /> We drilled three additional borings (B-1 through B-3) along the eastern edge of the site. The <br /> borings were drilled to depths greater than 50 feet until dense, non-liquefiable soil was <br /> encountered. The soil conditions encountered in the borings are relatively uniform. In our <br /> opinion, the five borings and four test pits along the eastern edge of the development are <br /> adequate for characterizing the soil conditions in this area. The locations of our additional <br /> borings are shown on the site plan on Figure 1 and copies of the boring logs are presented in the <br /> Attachment of this letter. <br /> REVIEW COMMENT 4 <br /> Page 2 of the report describes a 0 to 20-foot thickness of the silt and organic silt layer, which is <br /> not consistent with the historical explorations available. Boring B-101 indicates that the silt layer <br /> was observed to be as thick as 30 feet in some places. This should be clarified. <br /> RESPONSE TO REVIEW COMMENT 4 <br /> The site is typically underlain by a soft to medium stiff layer of silt and organic silt that varies in <br /> thickness from 0 to 20 feet. An additional 10-to 15-foot-thick layer of hard silt was observed in <br /> 2 of the 14 borings advanced on the site (ESNW B-101 and ESNW B-2). It was not discussed on <br /> our draft Summary of Settlement and Surcharge Analysis letter because this hard silt layer is <br /> generally absent and, where present, is too dense to be susceptible to consolidation settlement. <br /> Our comprehensive geotechnical report will identify that there is a hard silt layer present at some <br /> locations. <br /> REVIEW COMMENT 5 <br /> On Page 2 it states that a comprehensive geotechnical report for this project will be prepared at a <br /> later date that"addresses additional geotechnical aspects of this project." The comprehensive <br /> report must evaluate the potential impacts of seismic shaking, including liquefaction and lateral <br /> spreading, on the site and planned structures. Liquefaction, lateral spreading, and post- <br /> liquefaction settlement all appear to be significant issues with significant potential impacts to the <br /> development and the planned structures. Under an IBC level seismic event, the impacts of <br /> MIDESIGN.W 3 Polygon-128-01:081115 <br />