My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Walsh Construction Company II LLC 6/7/2021
>
Contracts
>
Capital Contract
>
Walsh Construction Company II LLC 6/7/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2023 3:53:32 PM
Creation date
6/10/2021 3:42:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Contractor's Name
Walsh Construction Company II LLC
Approval Date
6/7/2021
Council Approval Date
4/21/2021
Department
Public Works
Department Project Manager
Souheil Nasr
Subject / Project Title
Replacement of Reservoir 2
Public Works WO Number
UP3658
Tracking Number
0002940
Total Compensation
$0.00
Contract Type
Capital Contract
Retention Period
10 Years Then Transfer to State Archivist
Document Relationships
Walsh Construction II, LLC 8/24/2023 Change Order 3
(Contract)
Path:
\Documents\City Clerk\Contracts\Capital Contract\Capital Construction Contracts and Change Orders
Walsh Construction II, LLC 8/7/2023 Change Order 2
(Contract)
Path:
\Documents\City Clerk\Contracts\Capital Contract\Capital Construction Contracts and Change Orders
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1466
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1111, INN MI MP MI NOW APE MI MN WO MI MI NMI <br /> Bidder Comments Form <br /> Document Title: Replacement of Reservoir 2 Bidder Question Log Date: 3/18/2021 <br /> Item <br /> No. Dwg/Fig No. Reviewer's Comments Comment by Designer's Response <br /> Drawings,Specs,Report or Other Document(Refer to document below in Comments) <br /> ENTER SHEET <br /> NUMBER OR SPEC <br /> NUMBER BIDDER COMMENTS COMPANY RESPONSE <br /> See Addendum No 7.Some of the pipe is CCP,some welded steel.Detail 1 is used in one location on D180(western end of Charles). <br /> Sheet D180 has 3 locations of 30"CCP to be capped and abandoned.One location on Charles The other two locations(eastern end of Charles)are WSP.For all three,the pipe to get capped will be returned to service.Square <br /> Ave has keynote 16 calling for detail 1,to field weld existing wire mesh to the steel pipe.The Note 3 has been updated to refer to entirely fill pipe with CDF. <br /> 1 other locations on Federal Way call out note 6 referring to specification 33 1150.In 33 1150 <br /> 3.2,In Place Abandonment of Piping,it only calls for pipe to be cut and plugged with a minimum Walsh <br /> of 2 feed of non-shrink grout.Is the intent of the 2 location on Federal Way to include the same <br /> detail as the location on Charles?Or are the locations on Federal way to just have a dish head <br /> cap welded to pipe excluding welding the wire mesh to the pipe and grouted? <br /> Utility transformer and pad are the property of Snohomish PUD(PUD).For bidding purposes,assume the requirements of 26 27 00- <br /> Sheet E4 shows a proposed pad for the utility transformer.There is no detail for the pad itself. 3.1,A apply.Any modifications required by PUD will be tracked by force account. <br /> 26 27 00-3.1(A)(Equipment Bases)states"Unless otherwise indicated,bases shall be poured-in- <br /> 2 place concrete,nominally 3.5 Inches high and one inch larger on all exposed edges than the <br /> equipment to be mounted.Does this apply to the outdoor transformer pad?Will the pad Walsh <br /> require reinforcing?The same question for Sheet D120 Note 12 calling for relocating security <br /> camera and providing a new concrete pad.Please provide a detail for the transformer and <br /> security camera concrete pads. <br /> The spec section 3.6 B.states"A single/14 AWG negative...northeast corner of the XXX building Correct,it is the chlorine building.For bidding purposes,assume 100 feet of direct buried f14 AWG. <br /> 3 adjacent to Reservoir 4."Is this the Chlorine Building shown on drawing C410?Is this cable Norton <br /> routing shown in the plans anywhere? <br /> Drawing 0120 has a callout in about the middle of the page which says"See Note 6'. Note 6 See Addendum No 7 <br /> 4 does not exist on that page.Please resolve. JW Fowler <br /> 5 Drawing D130 doesn't show anything that pertains to Note 5.Please resolve. JW Fowler See Addendum No 7 <br /> Bid Item 5 has a quantity of 10.We assume that this Is 10 locations along the 340 length Correct,10 locations along the 340'length.City will assist to determine the joint locations. <br /> upsteam of the tie-in where the existing pipe joints will be secured.We are not aware of any as- <br /> h built piping drawings which have been provided to the bidder.Since that pipeline in in the JW Fowler <br /> driveway of the adjacent school,is the bidder to assume that you will provide the location of these <br /> joints?This approach will minimize the cost and keep construction crews from digging up the <br /> entire asphalt along this 340 foot length.Please advise. <br /> Bid Item 6 has a quantity of 15.We assume that this is 15 locations along the 400 length Correct,15 locations along the 400'length.City will assist to determine the joint locations. <br /> upsteam of the tie-in where the existing pipe joints will be secured.We are not aware of any as- <br /> 7 <br /> built piping drawings which have been provided to the bidder.Since that pipeline in in the JW Fowler <br /> driveway of the adjacent school,Is the bidder to assume that you will provide the location of these <br /> joints?This approach will minimize the cost and keep construction crews from digging up the <br /> entire asphalt along this 400 foot length.Please advise. <br /> At key note Al,there is a call out for a 60 CY thrust block.We find this to be enormous size <br /> (equivalent to 18'x 18'x 5').Perhaps this is a typo.This Is for a welded steel pipeline.Would you <br /> 8 rather have an encasement of 60 CY of Controlled Density Fill(CDF)?Not all the"tie-ins to JW Fowler This thrust block is designed as a gravity block.It is not certain at this time if the existing steel pipe is welded.Other tie-in locations <br /> existing piping"have thrust blocks.Please resolve. will have restrained joints per bid items 5 and 6. <br /> I he 12"Storm Urain(SU)system is shown in multiple locations as connecting to the 24"LA- Reservoir 4 is not used for potable water.The storm drains are intended to empty in Reservoir 4. <br /> piping.The 24"OF piping dumps into Reservoir 4.Did you intend to provide a potential pathway <br /> 9 for whatever is collected in these storm drain pipelines to flow to Reservoir 4?Please review and JW Fowler <br /> resolve. <br /> I he Lauren Valve Connection detail(2/C490)does not match the configuration that is shown on See Addendum No 7 <br /> 10 Dwg.C490.Please provided corrected drawings that match. JW Fowler <br /> I he Pipeline I est pressures given seem to be quite a bit larger than industry standard.Higher See Addendum No 7.Test pressure is based on 150%of working. <br /> than neccessary lest pressures are very dangerous.Typically we see pipline test pressures which <br /> 11 are 125%of operating pressure.Please consider revising these test pressures downward to JW Fowler <br /> comform with this accepted standard. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.