My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Thomco Construction Inc. 6/14/2021
>
Contracts
>
Capital Contract
>
Thomco Construction Inc. 6/14/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2022 10:53:29 AM
Creation date
6/18/2021 10:03:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Contractor's Name
Thomco Construction Inc.
Approval Date
6/14/2021
Council Approval Date
5/19/2021
Department
Public Works
Department Project Manager
Amie Roshak
Subject / Project Title
Water Main Replacement V
Public Works WO Number
UP3730
Tracking Number
0002953
Total Compensation
$1,924,004.26
Contract Type
Capital Contract
Retention Period
10 Years Then Transfer to State Archivist
Document Relationships
Thomco Construction Inc. 6/22/2022 Change Order 1
(Contract)
Path:
\Documents\City Clerk\Contracts\Capital Contract
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
492
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' KRAZAN&ASSOCIATES,INC. <br /> KA Project No. 092-20006 <br /> DRAFT Geotechnical Engineering Investigation <br /> Everett Water Main"V" <br /> May 7,2020 <br /> Page No. 19 <br /> 1 <br /> Contractor. Furthermore, Krazan & Associates is not responsible for the contractor's procedures, <br /> methods,scheduling or management of the work site. <br /> LIMITATIONS <br /> Geotechnical engineering is one of the newest divisions of Civil Engineering. This branch of Civil <br /> Engineering is constantly improving as new technologies and understanding of earth sciences improves. <br /> Although your site was analyzed using the most appropriate current techniques and methods, <br /> undoubtedly there will be substantial future improvements in this branch of engineering. In addition to <br /> improvements in the field of geotechnical engineering, physical changes in the site either due to <br /> excavation or fill placement, new agency regulations or possible changes in the proposed structure after <br /> the time of completion of the soils report may require the soils report to be professionally reviewed. In <br /> light of this, the owner should be aware that there is a practical limit to the usefulness of this report <br /> without critical review. Although the time limit for this review is strictly arbitrary, it is suggested that <br /> two years be considered a reasonable time for the usefulness of this report. <br /> ' Earthwork construction is characterized by the presence of a calculated risk that soil and groundwater <br /> conditions have been fully revealed by the original subsurface investigation. This risk is derived from <br /> the practical necessity of basing interpretations and design conclusions on limited sampling of the earth. <br /> Our report, design conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of the <br /> subsurface conditions. Actual subsurface conditions may differ, sometimes significantly, from those <br /> indicated in this report. The recommendations made in this report are based on the assumption that soil <br /> conditions do not vary significantly from those disclosed during our field investigation. The findings <br /> and conclusions of this report can be affected by the passage of time, such as seasonal weather <br /> conditions, manmade influences, such as construction on or adjacent to the site, natural events such as <br /> earthquakes, slope instability, flooding, or groundwater fluctuations. If any variations or undesirable <br /> conditions are encountered during construction, the geotechnical engineer should be notified so that <br /> supplemental recommendations can be made. <br /> The conclusions of this report are based on the information provided regarding the proposed <br /> construction. If the proposed construction is relocated or redesigned,the conclusions in this report may <br /> ' not be valid. The geotechnical engineer should be notified of any changes so that the recommendations <br /> can be reviewed and reevaluated. <br /> Misinterpretations of this report by other design team members can result in project delays and cost <br /> ' overruns. These risks can be reduced by having Krazan & Associates, Inc. involved with the design <br /> teams meetings and discussions after submitting the report. Krazan & Associates, Inc. should also be <br /> retained for reviewing pertinent elements of the design team's plans and specifications. Contractors can <br /> ' Krazan&Associates,Inc. <br /> Offices Serving The Western United States <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.