Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> 6. Collect qualitative data on features such as land use, impervious surfaces, topography, and <br /> soil types. <br /> • Data reviewed during resource review was confirmed during the field inspection. <br /> 7. Collect information on pipe sizes, channel characteristics, drainage structures, and relevant <br /> critical areas <br /> • The system is documented in the City's GIS system. Refer to Appendix A-4 for a <br /> printout from the City's GIS. <br /> 8. Verify tributary basins delineated in Task 1. <br /> • Tributary basins were confirmed from Task 1. <br /> 9. Contact neighboring property owners or residents in the area about past or existing <br /> drainage problems, and describe these in the report. <br /> • No drainage reports were recorded by the City. <br /> 10. Note the date and weather conditions at the time of inspection. <br /> • Noted above. <br /> 3.4 Task 4—Drainage System Description and Existing/Predicted Problems <br /> Because the City has a well-documented drainage system via their GIS and the system <br /> 1 discharges to a combined storm/sewer system, a field investigation was not performed. Refer to <br /> Appendix A-4 for the Downstream Study Map, which is a printout from the City's GIS. <br /> 4.0 Permanent Stormwater Control Plan <br /> This project meets MRs 5 and 7 by providing a Permanent Stormwater Control Plan, which <br /> includes Onsite Stormwater Management(OSM) BMP and Flow Control per Interim Policy 2-11. <br /> The stormwater modeling software, MGSFlood (the model), was utilized to size facilities and <br /> confirm compliance with the City Manual. <br /> 4.1 Site Hydrology <br /> The site hydrology is determined by the type of land coverage and soil type. According to the <br /> Geotechnical Report, the site is underlain with typically dense to very dense, brown/grey, damp, <br /> gravelly sand interpreted as native glacial till. The geotechnical engineer does not consider the <br /> subsurface conditions to be generally suitable for infiltration of stormwater. Site soils are <br /> modeled as Type C soils because there is no infiltration potential. Existing landscape was <br /> modeled as"Till Grass,"while proposed landscape areas were modeled as"Till Pasture." This is <br /> due to existing landscaping assumed to not meet BMP 12.20, Post-Construction Soil Quality and <br /> Depth, while proposed landscaping will be required to do so. According to the DOE 2019 <br /> Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (SMMWW), Appendix C, page C-12, <br /> areas meeting this BMP shall be entered as pasture in the model. Per Interim Policy 2-11, the <br /> predeveloped conditions shall be modeled as the existing conditions. <br /> Refer to Appendix A-2 for the Existing Conditions Map and Appendix A-3 for the Developed <br /> Conditions Map. The table below provides a summary of areas that were entered into the model: <br /> Stormwater Site Plan Report <br /> North Sound Behavioral Health Treatment Ciel00 <br /> AHBL No.2170857.10 <br />