Laserfiche WebLink
Capital Architects Group ,,( <br /> 2813 Rockefeller Ave.Everett,WA 98201•ph:425.317.8017 •fax:425.317.8489 <br /> 06.29.2020 <br /> City of Everett Permit Services D ��3200 Cedar Street Everett,WA 98201 <br /> JUL - g E112V020ED <br /> Attention: Drew Martin, P.E.,S.E. <br /> RE: Plan Check Number B2003-040, First Building Review CITY OF EVERETT <br /> Owner: Crux LLC permit <br /> Job Address: 5208 S 2nd Avenue Services <br /> Drew, <br /> Thank you for your review comments. Please note our written responses for each item below: <br /> Architectural <br /> 1. The proposed project appears to be located at 5208 S 2nd Avenue. The project address should be verified and <br /> the construction drawings revised as needed. Note that this comment is not duplicated for other disciplines, <br /> and should be applied to all drawings in the submittal. See IBC Section 501.2. <br /> Response: <br /> We acknowledge the correct address as 5208 S 2nd Avenue and have revised the plans to reflect this. <br /> 2. The construction drawings specify replacement of the existing bridge with a new aluminum bridge. The existing <br /> guards shown at each end of the bridge on Sheet A-1.0 are presumed to have been connected to the original <br /> bridge,but are not connected for the replacement bridge. The following comments should be addressed: <br /> a. Details showing the interface of the existing and bridge guards should be provided in the drawings. The <br /> guards should comply with IBC Section 1015.4. <br /> b. The guard ends that are not positively connected to the bridge structure should be modified to comply with <br /> IBC Section 1607.8.1. Details modifying the guards and their connections to the supporting structures <br /> should be provided in the construction drawings. Calculations substantiating the design should be <br /> submitted for review. <br /> c. Continuing with the previous comment,if connections are provided between the deck guards and the <br /> bridge,they should be provided with isolation joints similar to Detail E2 of the bridge drawings. <br /> Calculations substantiating that the joints comply with ASCE 7-10 Section 12.12.3. See IBC Section 1613.1. <br /> Response:The existing guard rails on the deck and parking lot ARE NOT connected to the bridge(see <br /> photos).The design of the bridge allows for movement of the bridge in seismic conditions. The gap <br /> between the bridge guard rails and the existing guard rails will be less than 4"and a 4"sphere will not pass <br /> between them. <br /> Structural <br /> 1. Structural special inspections are required for this project. The"Statement on Special Inspections" in the <br /> Structural General Notes on Sheet S1.1 stating that special inspections are not required should be revised. The <br /> statement should include a table listing each type of special inspection and shall specify the extent of each <br /> inspection(e.g.,continuous,periodic)per IBC Section 1704.3.1. See IBC Sections 107.1, 1704.2.3 and 1704.3. <br /> Required inspections include but are not limited to: <br /> a. Concrete post-installed anchors per IBC Table 1705.3(4). <br /> Response: <br /> Refer to revised sheet 51.1 for special inspection requirements. <br /> b. Steel construction per IBC Section 1705.2.1 and AISC 360-10 Chapter N. <br /> Response: <br /> Refer to revised sheet 51.1 for special inspection requirements. <br /> c. Aluminum construction per IBC Section 2002.1 and AA ADM 1-15. <br /> Response: <br /> Refer to response in item#2 below. <br /> (1-1 Page <br />