My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1318 37TH ST Geotech Report 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
37TH ST
>
1318
>
Geotech Report
>
1318 37TH ST Geotech Report 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2022 1:54:24 PM
Creation date
9/14/2021 7:40:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
37TH ST
Street Number
1318
Address Document Type
Geotech Report
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. James Pirie • t JN 97072 <br /> • March 15, 1997 Page 3 <br /> Groundwater <br /> Neither c,roundwater seeFage nor � et s�ils were observed in our explorations. Sinc2 the test pits <br /> were cnnductad follcwing a wet wir�te�, :his indicates that substantial groundwater seepaya would <br /> likely not be encountered on most portions of the site during excavation. It should be noted that <br /> groundwater levels vary seasonally with rainfall and other factors. We an;icipate that groundwater <br /> cou�d be found between tiie near-surface, weathered soil 2nd the underlying dense sand�, and in <br /> more permeable soil layers withir, the dense sands. This is most likely to occur in low arezs of the <br /> property. <br /> COtdCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> General <br /> 6ased on our observatior�s and the results of our explorations, the pmposed site development <br /> appears feasible from a geotechnical engine�ring standpoint. The presence of silty, moisture- <br /> sensitive soils and the extensive grading that is planned appear to be the most si�nificant <br /> geotechnical concerns. <br /> . Conventional foundations can be used to supoort the buildings and retaining walis. Cut portions of <br /> the buildings should bear on medium-dense to dense, native :,oils. No more than 5 feet of <br /> structural fill placed above the mediiam-dense to dense, native soils should underlie footings. This <br /> ' reduces tt:� potential f�r excessive differentiai settlement throughout the buildings. It wili also likely <br /> be necessary to extend columns and foundation walls beneath portions of the building to limit <br /> �fifferential settlement. <br /> Floors and garage slabs c:�� be supported on native soils or structural fill. All topsoil and existing <br /> `II should be removed from slab or pavement areas before placing structurel fill. Slabs over deep <br /> fills should be reinforce�� with steel bars. This wili limit, but not prevent, differential slab settlement <br /> • aiid cracking. <br /> Flexible fill walis, such as geogrid-reinforced rockeries or modular block walls, should be <br /> considered for parkiny areas where new deep fills will be placed. These walls can tolerate more <br /> seltlement than conventional concrete walls without structural damage. <br /> The on-site soiis are silty and fine-grained, making them moisture-sensitive. Reuse of the native <br /> silty sands as structural fill will only be possible during dry weather and if the excavated soils are <br /> prevented from becoming wet prior to placement and compaction. No wet soils were observed in <br /> our explorations. If very moist to wet soils are encountered during earthwork, they v✓ill need to be <br /> dried prior to compaction. lhis is generally only possible during hot, dry weather. A�equate <br /> compaction of all fill, in�luding utility backfill, for structural areas must be completed in accordance <br /> with our recommendations to limif the potential for settlement. <br /> Erosion cont�ol measures will be necessary at this site during wet weather. As a minimum, rock <br /> construction =ntrances should be provided and silt fences should be installed along the downslope <br /> sides of the property. Subgrades for footings and slabs should be protected with a 2- to 4-inch <br /> layer of gravel. This reduces subgrade disturbance due to foot traffic. Additional erosion and <br /> subgrade protection measures may be necessary, depending an the conditions ercountered during <br /> , construction. <br /> —� <br /> � GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. ul� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.