Laserfiche WebLink
Proposed Everett Warehouse <br />ZipperGeo Project No. 2152.01 <br />March 5, 2019 <br />is avoided. Any surface runoff directed towards softscaped slopes should be collected at the top of the <br />slope and routed to the bottom of the slope and discharged in a manner that prevents erosion. <br />Permanent Foundation Wall Drainage <br />Adequate drainage measures must be installed to collect and direct subsurface water away from subgrade <br />walls. All backfilled walls should include a drainage aggregate zone extending a minimum of two feet from <br />the back of wall for the full height of the wall and wide enough at the base of the wall to allow seepage <br />to flow to the footing drain. The drainage aggregate should consist of material meeting the requirements <br />of WSDOT 9-03.12(2), Gravel Backfill for Walls. A minimum 4-inch diameter, perforated PVC drain pipe <br />should be provided at the base of backfilled walls to collect and direct subsurface water to an appropriate <br />discharge point. We recommend placing a non -woven geotextile, such as Mirafi 140N, or equivalent, <br />around the free draining backfill material. <br />Pavements <br />Pavement Life and Maintenance: It should be realized that asphaltic pavements are not maintenance - <br />free. The following pavement sections represent our minimum recommendations for an average level of <br />performance during a 20-year design life; therefore, an average level of maintenance will likely be <br />required. A 20-year pavement life typically assumes that an overlay will be placed after about 10 to 12 <br />years. Thicker asphalt, base, and subbase courses would offer better long-term performance, but would <br />cost more initially. Conversely, thinner courses would be more susceptible to "alligator" cracking and <br />other failure modes. As such, pavement design can be considered a compromise between a high initial <br />cost and low maintenance costs versus a low initial cost and higher maintenance costs. <br />Our recommendations for pavements provided in this section are based on recommendations presented <br />in Chapter 4, Low -Volume Road Design of the 1993 AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Sections Low <br />Volume Road Design. As part of our work, we completed a CBR test to evaluate pavement subgrade <br />support characteristics. Our testing indicated a CBR value of about 34 for site soils compacted to 95% of <br />the ASTM D1557 modified proctor maximum dry density. <br />Pavement Pavement Design Criteria: No traffic loading was provided for this project. For pavement design, we <br />assumed an 18-kip traffic level of 50,000 to 300,000 equivalent single axle loads, or low traffic levels as <br />defined by AASHTO. For other design criteria, we assumed the following: <br />• Inherent Reliability: 75 percent <br />• Relative Quality of Roadbed Soil: Very Good <br />Recommended Minimum Pavement Sections: Based on the above assumed design criteria, we <br />recommend the following pavement sections. For light -duty pavements (parking space areas and low <br />volume areas), we recommend 2 inches of asphalt concrete over 4 inches of crushed rock base course. <br />Page 15 <br />