Resolution 7700 - Laserfiche WebLink

Meeting Notes Discussion was also conducted regarding the likelihood of duplexes and townhomes being built in the short term versus long term. Although it may take some time, allowing varieties would give the market the opportunity when and if it becomes feasible. Comments were made about Accessory Dwelling Units and Detached Accessory Dwelling Units could be good options in lower density zones, however anecdotally, do not pencil out. The question was asked about allowing innovative construction types that could be a more modular construction that was a “preapproved” plan. This could reduce the cost to make ADUs more feasible. Committee members also inquired about impervious surface limitations and if those regulations should also be reviewed to ensure more structures could be added to residential lots. The Committee discussed looking at certain areas where the housing stock was older and less good shape such as property between Pacific & 41st and Rucker & Broadway where the market conditions may be more feasible. Committee members acknowledged the development pressure the City is seeing. Committee members also acknowledged that the lack of housing supply is affecting the cost of housing in addition to rising construction cost however, demand can attract and justify the need for more housing options. 5. Introduction of Draft Strategy Concepts – Development on Urban Corridors – Staff/Consultants The City’s consultant, John Owen of Makers presented draft recommendations for development in Urban Corridors. The recommendations include: SHORT TERM • Consider reducing parking requirement, allowing additional housing types and more flexible development standards in TOD centers. MID-TERM • Monitor real estate conditions to identify effective development incentives. • Develop a parking demand model to establish parking requirements. • Develop parks and open spaces where needed. • Monitor socio-economic conditions. • Work with agency and non-profit housing providers. • A map was shown for reference purposes only showing the High Frequency Transit Corridors related to the location of R1 and R2 Zones. 6. Committee Discussion – Chair Committee members suggested looking at the Urban Land Institutes “Healthy Urban Corridors” to incorporate desired elements for development along Urban Corridors. Concerns and issues about displacement were discussed several times recognizing that it is important to monitor housing impacts closely. Committee members discussed the concept of requiring no parking requirements within ¼ (½) mile of a high frequency Transit Corridors. Walkability is an important factor in successfully reducing parking and it was noted that Transportation was looking at areas along these corridors for pedestrian improvements as well. Discussion included analyzing a thoughtful transition area of R1 and R2 within a certain distance of the corridors and acknowledgement that changes should include strong criteria.